메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
417 - 442 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
KIKO is a financial product designed to help small exporters hedge against currency fluctuations. In 2008, with the won-dollar exchange rate soaring above what was originally expected, many KIKO subscribers have suffered losses as they have to buy dollars at a higher rate to repay their dollar-denominated debt to banks. So some say that KIKO contracts is initially designed as advantageous to banks. KIKO is not terms and conditions. KIKO is not beneficial to the bank unilaterally. And the principle of change of the basis of contract does not apply to KIKO. In KIKO, it is a subject matter that the bank's violation of principle of suitability and duty to explanation. The principle of suitability is that no bank shall recommend an company to make an investment, if the investment is considered unsuitable for the company in light of the investment purpose, status of property, experience in investment, etc. of the company. And the duty to explanation is that the bank shall explain the details of the financial investment instrument, the risks contingent upon the investment with such sufficiency as to allow the ordinary investor to understand them. If the bank violate duty to explanation, he shall liable for the damages inflicted upon company. Though KIKO has some problems, company may not always exempt from the loss of clients. If a company utilizes KIKO as a speculation purpose, it bears certain degree of responsibility.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0