메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제50권 제1호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
297 - 313 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
T. S. Eliot’s poetry of “the first voice,” distinguished from Browning’s dramatic monologue, which he called poetry of “the second voice,” is in fact his vision and revision of the traditional form of dramatic monologue. It signals an effort to find an objective form beyond traditional generic boundaries, in order to accommodate the highly subjective content of the modern self. This effort dates back to Browning, and continued by Yeats and Pound before Eliot took it. The objective of this essay is to investigate how much Eliot’s poetry of the first voice owes to Browning, Yeats, and Pound, and how far it moves from them by his re/vision. It is Browning who established the form dramatic monologue with its distinctive conventions, the idiosyncratic persona, the silent listener and the irony originating from the tension between the persona and the audience. Yeats’s theory of the Mask, seeing oppositions as a necessary ingredient of life and step towards a unity, modernized and developed it, introducing morality and a self divided within. Pound then elated its morality to the theological plane by coloring it with the Dantean voice, whereas Laforgue tightened it with his peculiar irony. Finally it is Eliot who, standing on these precursors’ efforts, completed it into a form of perspective, with the self vacillating between various points of view, where the inherently subjective content, the “psychic material,” is rendered impersonal.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0