메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
배수정 (세토시미술관)
저널정보
한국근현대미술사학회 한국근현대미술사학 한국근현대미술사학 제37집
발행연도
2019.7
수록면
35 - 67 (33page)
DOI
10.46834/jkmcah.2019.07.37.35

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the well-known an artist of the Mingei(folk crafts) Hamada Shōji’s works and rethinks his style considering the influencing relation with Korean Ceramics. Previous research focused on his works style in UK, Okinawa, and Mashiko where he actually did his Mingei works. However, there is less attention to the relationship between Joseon Ceramics (especially Buncheong ware), which seems has influences on the Form(shape), decoration(design), and techniques. Ever since Hamada’s first visit to Korea in 1918, he made works which has been influenced by Korean Ceramics in the shape such as flask and the painted iron and brushed slip technique throughout his life. He involved the Mingei Movement with Yanagi Muneyoshi and collected Korean Ceramics.
In this paper, I focused on his style changing by periods in three aspects: Form(shape), decoration(design), and technique. Regarding the decoration, this paper examines Hamada’s trademark sugarcane design, and divide this into five periods: Early design, late design, groping and experiment, complete, and liberation period. This paper also tries to explore the relationship between Hamada’s works and Korean Ceramics through the comparison with the Hamada’s Korean Ceramic selection in the Shoji Hamada Memorial Mashiko-Sankokan Museum and Yanagi’s collection in the Japan Folks Crafts Museum. Hamada’s works style changes in 1936~38 and his works changed noticeably influenced by Korean Ceramics. Korean ceramics influenced not only his style but his ideology on the Mingei. The liberal and nonobjective expression of his ceramics manufactured in the last ‘liberation period’ are the parallel of ‘glass and flower design of Korean Ceramics.’ Conclusively Korean Ceramic is not the only source of this works but it took an essential role in his works.

목차

I. 머리말
II. 하마다 작품의 특질과 조선도자
Ⅲ. 하마다의 작풍 변화와 조선도자
Ⅳ. 사탕수수문(糖黍文)의 시대적 변천
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (91)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-605-000946856