메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이문영 (서울대학교)
저널정보
한국슬라브유라시아학회 슬라브학보 슬라브학보 제34권 제2호
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
179 - 214 (36page)
DOI
10.46694/JSS.2019.06.34.2.179

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Currently, East Asia is becoming an arena where the grand state narratives such as China"s "One-Belt-One-Road", Russia"s "Eurasianism", Japan"s "Free and Open Ind-Pacific Strategy" and Korea"s "Northeast Asia Plus Responsibility Community" compete and collide. These grand strategies are conceptualized as the "revival of geopolitics", which multiply the monopoly system of the US supremacy in the era of globalization. The commonality of these "geopolitics" is that they imagine the future development of each country in the expanded framework of "regionalism" linked to geographical adjacency, historical and cultural affinity, economic complementarity. All of these grand strategies assume "Eurasia" as the main geographic space. Russia moving eastward toward the Eurasian Union, China moving westward along the One-Belt, Japan moving north over the arcs connecting the Indian and the Pacific Oceans, Korea hoping to fly from the peninsula to the continent with the wings of peace meet in Eurasia. In principle, these new regionalist initiatives based on Eurasia promise mutual respect and common prosperity among the countries of the region. However, it is questionable whether they can be differentiated from existing geopolitical strategies and whether it will be a new civilizational project that can allow to imagine the post-global capitalism system beyond simple regional economic cooperation. In order to judge this, it is necessary to examine not only the political and economic drivers, but also historio-cultural, philosophical and civilizational origins of them. From these problematics, this article examines this focusing on the case of Russian Eurasianism. To this end, it investigates the classical Eurasianism of the 1920-30s and the neo-Eurasianism after 1990s with the keyword of Russian imperial identity, and examines the meaning of Putin"s pragmatic Eurasianism and the Eurasian Union initiative, and finally illuminates the social consciousness of Russia from the view point of the affections of empire.

목차

I. 동아시아, ‘지정학의 귀환’과 거대국가서사의 충돌
II. 유라시아주의와 러시아의 ‘제국’ 정체성
III. 푸틴의 실용적 유라시아주의: ‘유라시아경제연합’에서 ‘유라시아연합’으로
IV. 제국의 정동: 유라시아주의와 러시아의 사회의식
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (88)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0