지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As Chosun was a country founded with the military coup caused by Wihwado(威化島) Retreat as a chance, the kings of the country throughout the history were quite sensitive about the employment of the military. Particularly, Taejong(太宗) regarded military power as the source of authority and abolished the private miliary system but established the public one in order to make the king’s monopoly of the military power firmly, and he also abolished the private relations between the general and soldiers. Later, Chosun government divided the military organization into peace and war footings and did not allow the commander of the peace footing to lead the military that he had selected and trained himself during the war and allowed the commander appointed additionally by the center to command the military.
Concerning the defense system at the initial period of Imjin-war, Jeolla-do(全羅道) and Gyeongsangwu-do(慶尙右道) dealt with it quite differently. Jeolla coped with the wartime situations while maintaining the peace footing. Originally, the commander of the peace footing was not allowed to lead the military under his command during the war. In the urgent situation, however, as the government did not send the commander of the war footing, Jeolla’s governor, the commander of the peace footing, did command and control the troops and soldiers. In Gyeongsangwu-do, however, as both peace and war footings collapsed at the early period of Imjinwaeran, sajok(士族) from all different places became the forces leader and collected the scattered soldiers to go out to drive away the Japanese invaders. Yet, that forces organization was similar to that of the war footing.
About the Seongju(星州) Combat, it has been known that it took place three times, but according to 『Nanjungjaprok(亂中雜錄)』, those three times were not all. To recover Seongju Seong(星州城), either large or small combats had developed up to 18 times. In the meantime, a lot of righteous armies were sacrificed. The righteous armies’ activity was even more noticeable in Gyeongsangwu-do than in Jeolla-do. As one of the reasons for that, we can point out the fact that peace and war footings both collapsed in Gyeongsang and also solidarity among sajok(士族) and their control over the people were stronger there than in Jeolla.
Concerning the defense system at the initial period of Imjin-war, Jeolla-do(全羅道) and Gyeongsangwu-do(慶尙右道) dealt with it quite differently. Jeolla coped with the wartime situations while maintaining the peace footing. Originally, the commander of the peace footing was not allowed to lead the military under his command during the war. In the urgent situation, however, as the government did not send the commander of the war footing, Jeolla’s governor, the commander of the peace footing, did command and control the troops and soldiers. In Gyeongsangwu-do, however, as both peace and war footings collapsed at the early period of Imjinwaeran, sajok(士族) from all different places became the forces leader and collected the scattered soldiers to go out to drive away the Japanese invaders. Yet, that forces organization was similar to that of the war footing.
About the Seongju(星州) Combat, it has been known that it took place three times, but according to 『Nanjungjaprok(亂中雜錄)』, those three times were not all. To recover Seongju Seong(星州城), either large or small combats had developed up to 18 times. In the meantime, a lot of righteous armies were sacrificed. The righteous armies’ activity was even more noticeable in Gyeongsangwu-do than in Jeolla-do. As one of the reasons for that, we can point out the fact that peace and war footings both collapsed in Gyeongsang and also solidarity among sajok(士族) and their control over the people were stronger there than in Jeolla.
#임진왜란 초기 방어실태
#전라도 방어
#경상우도 방어
#성주 전투
#평시체제
#전시체제
#난중잡록
#의병
#The Status of Defense at the Initial Period of Imjin-war(壬辰倭亂)
#The defense system of Jeolla-do(全羅道)
#The defense system of Gyeongsangwu-do(慶尙右道)
#The Seongju (星州) Combat
#The peace footing
#The war footing
#Nanjungjaprok(亂中雜錄)
#Righteous armies(義兵)
목차
1. 머리말
2. 임진왜란 초기 전라도와 경상우도의 방어실태
3. 『난중잡록』을 통하여 본 성주 전투
4. 맺음말
〈참고 문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정조의 평화사상: 탕평과 활법을 중심으로
통일과 평화
2018 .01
-
It Takes Three to Make a Korean Peace
Global Asia
2019 .06
-
한국군 상부지휘구조 개편의 필요성과 지향점
한국국가전략
2024 .03
-
평화문화와 지속가능한 평화 : 한국에서의 의미와 과제
문화와 정치
2018 .06
-
Women Teaching Peace: Shaping the Thought and Action of Future Generations
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding
2019 .01
-
Peace Studies in Japan: Co-evolution of Knowledge and Practice
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding
2023 .05
-
이정암과 연안성 전투의 군사적 의의
한국군사학논총
2019 .01
-
Peace in Korea : Next Steps
Global Asia
2018 .09
-
지역주민운동을 통한 주민되기 : 성주사드배치철회운동을 중심으로
지역사회학
2022 .08
-
IN SEARCH OF PEACE ON THE SILK ROAD: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE
Acta Via Serica
2017 .06
-
임진왜란 연구의 회고와 제안
군사
2016 .09
-
군신과 평화 : 김진균의 군사 · 평화 연구
경제와사회
2024 .09
-
20세기 전환기 중국 평화담론 연구 ― “세계평화회의”를 중심으로
중국학논총
2018 .01
-
From Peace Olympics to Olympic Peace
Global Asia
2018 .03
-
신흥평화의 개념적 탐구: ‘창발(emergence)’의 시각에서 본 평화연구의 새로운 지평
한국정치학회보
2023 .03
-
New Perspectives on Building a Peace Regime on the Korean Peninsula: “Restorative Peace Discourse” and “Restorative Peace Treaty”
Journal of Peace and Unification
2017 .01
-
Peace in Korea: A Way Forward
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2020 .01
-
Peace Studies Professionalism and Peace Movement Idealism
평화학연구
2016 .12
-
평화감수성 함양을 위한 평화교육으로서의 통일교육 연구
인격교육
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
청도 지역 固城李氏 가문의 임진왜란 극복 양상
김강식
역사와 세계
2018
.12
기억방식을 통해 본 임진왜란의 서사 양상
음영철
,
박은미
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2018
.11
1637년 청나라의 조선 정복 전쟁 - 구범진, 『병자호란, 홍타이지의 전쟁』(까치, 2019)에 대한 서평
계승범
동북아역사논총
2020
.09
임진왜란 당시 조선 화포(중완구) 문화재복원
임형웅
,
최원호
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2020
.07
조선과 만주국 국경변연지대(國境邊緣地帶)에서의 항일투쟁과 일제 식민당국의 대응 - 조선의 신문보도 내용을 중심으로
윤휘탁
동북아역사논총
2020
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-390-000788356