지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On the contemporary era, the unclassified secret sources, the documents and materials of interviews with those who participated or worked in association with the Cuban Missile Crisis let us know the activities of the Soviet Submarines, and the processes and effects of the US maritime quarantine operation. Thus, now it is possible to synthetically analyze it from the viewpoints of naval component operations. Consequently, the purpose of this article is, on the basis of the results of the analysis, to draw the critical success factors of the US maritime quarantine operation in the Cuban Missile Crisis. For this, I employ the literature review approach on the bases of the governmental unclassified secret sources, the memoirs, the related thesis/articles and multimedia data.
According to results of the research, the critical success factors were not only the active diplomacy technic for the coercive approach on Mikita Khrushchew, the Soviet Leader, by providing carrot and stick at the same time using nuclear and conventional powers, but also the detailed operational directives deterring a real conflict with the Soviet Foxtrot submarines backed by the Cuban troops, deployed limited missile strength and land based the Soviet army in Cuba in advance. They were the critical factors of de-escalating the nuclear crisis and of saving the world as well as the US from the danger of breaking out a nuclear war.
The additional factors were the infeasibility of employing the nuclear strategies of the mutual massive retaliations, the US setting regarding the purpose and performing procedures of the maritime quarantine and the Soviet understanding on them, unremitting coercive activities and capability revelation, and lastly keeping the posture for perfect verification against the Soviet nuclear/conventional materials(sources) deployed in Cuba. All of these were proved by the logical bases.
The practical lesson of the US maritime quarantine in the Cuban Missile Crisis is that the military lessons of the past operation will not be the directives for a future war. In order to succeed in a future war, it is essential to develop a new strategy reflecting not only the lessons of the past military operations, but also diverse contemporary political and strategic environmental factors.
According to results of the research, the critical success factors were not only the active diplomacy technic for the coercive approach on Mikita Khrushchew, the Soviet Leader, by providing carrot and stick at the same time using nuclear and conventional powers, but also the detailed operational directives deterring a real conflict with the Soviet Foxtrot submarines backed by the Cuban troops, deployed limited missile strength and land based the Soviet army in Cuba in advance. They were the critical factors of de-escalating the nuclear crisis and of saving the world as well as the US from the danger of breaking out a nuclear war.
The additional factors were the infeasibility of employing the nuclear strategies of the mutual massive retaliations, the US setting regarding the purpose and performing procedures of the maritime quarantine and the Soviet understanding on them, unremitting coercive activities and capability revelation, and lastly keeping the posture for perfect verification against the Soviet nuclear/conventional materials(sources) deployed in Cuba. All of these were proved by the logical bases.
The practical lesson of the US maritime quarantine in the Cuban Missile Crisis is that the military lessons of the past operation will not be the directives for a future war. In order to succeed in a future war, it is essential to develop a new strategy reflecting not only the lessons of the past military operations, but also diverse contemporary political and strategic environmental factors.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 이론적 검토
3. 쿠바 미사일 위기 시 해상차단 작전 현황
4. 분석 및 평가
5. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
[보고서] - 김덕기 / 2017 / 미국의 선택 가능 대북군사옵션과 해상봉쇄
[단행본] - 김태현 / 2004 / 결정의 엣센스 / 모음북스
[인터넷자원] - 장성호 / / 정부, 대량살상무기 PSI 전면 참여 발표…北핵실험 대응(3보) / 한국경제
[인터넷자원] - 정다슬 / / 한미일, 대량살상무기 확산 방지 위한 해상훈련 실시 / 이데일리
[단행본] - Allison, Graham / 1999 / Essen of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis / An Imprint of Addison Wesley Longman
[단행본] - 김태현 / 2004 / 결정의 엣센스 / 모음북스
[인터넷자원] - 장성호 / / 정부, 대량살상무기 PSI 전면 참여 발표…北핵실험 대응(3보) / 한국경제
[인터넷자원] - 정다슬 / / 한미일, 대량살상무기 확산 방지 위한 해상훈련 실시 / 이데일리
[단행본] - Allison, Graham / 1999 / Essen of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis / An Imprint of Addison Wesley Longman
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1990년대 ‘평시 특별시기’ 이후 쿠바 여성정책의 변화와 지속성
정치정보연구
2016 .02
-
Cuba 1962 : Lessons for the Missile Crisis in North Korea Today
Global Asia
2017 .12
-
An Analysis of Nationalism and Racism in the Early Cuban Baseball
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2020 .01
-
쿠바한인 디아스포라의 독립운동 재조명과 정부 서훈 문제
한국보훈논총
2017 .01
-
Conflict beyond the Superpowers: Revisiting the Cuban Missile Crisis through the Soviet Union-Cuba Alliance
연구방법논총
2024 .07
-
미 합참의 “군사조언”과 정책결정과정
군사
2017 .09
-
쿠바 의료 외교의 유용성과 한계
라틴아메리카연구
2019 .05
-
효과적 검역체계를 위한 검역법 개선방안
보건행정학회지
2018 .01
-
The Spurious Nuclear Learning: Why Nixon Used Nuclear Coercion during the Vietnam War
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2020 .01
-
특별한 시기(1991-1993) 이후 쿠바의 경제 및 사회 변화: 의료 부문을 중심으로
한국도시지리학회지
2024 .08
-
냉전기 太平洋지역 美·蘇간 해군력 경쟁 : 해양지정학의 인식 변화를 중심으로
군사
2017 .09
-
North Korea's Aid to Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis*
Pacific Focus
2022 .12
-
Ukraine-Russia War and a Nuclear Crisis: How Dangerous It Could Be?
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2022 .06
-
쿠바한인 100년의 오디세이: 재미 쿠바한인의 연속적 트랜스내셔널 모빌리티 경험을 중심으로
다문화사회연구
2021 .10
-
개발전략으로서 산업정책: 쿠바의 경험과정책적 시사점
국제지역연구
2018 .01
-
지리요소에 의한 해양패권 도전국가의 해양전략 변화 - 1차대전 시 독일과 냉전기 소련의 사례를 중심으로-
군사
2019 .09
-
The Past and Present of ex-Soviet Koreans
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .07
-
코로나19 팬데믹과 북한문학
통일정책연구
2023 .06
-
트럼프 집권 이후의 동북아와 한·미·일 관계
Journal of North Korea Studies
2016 .12
-
Can Lessons Learned from Past Economic Crises Help Predict Future Economic Crises?
계량경제학보
2022 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-390-000339615