지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제110호
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 105 - 140 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.12.110.105
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From the Pyeong’yang-seong area, total of five Gakja Seong-seok relics have been found so far. Information extracted from these relics include the Ganji designation of the year the construction of the fortress began, name of the project’s supervisor, the length of fortress sections that were constructed. These are undoubtedly vital information in determining in what feature and how the Goguryeo dynasty built the Jang’an-seong fortress in Pyeong’yang.
Most of the fortress walls are now gone, but there is a detailed map of the area created during the Japanese occupation period. In this study, the map is cross-referenced with Google Earth, and verification of the information on the Gakja Seong-seok relics is attempted, using data such as circumference or gross area.
In case of relic No.1, which is generally understood to have been found near Otan, a description on that says “11 Ri(里) to the West” seems to be indicating that relic belonged to the South wall of the Middle (“Jungseong”) fortress. In case of relic No.2, which was found at the Hansa-jeong pavilion at the South side of the Jang’an-seong fortress, there is a line saying “12 Ri to the East.” Considering the length of the actual vestige, it seems like the Goguryeo people used a Cheok scale in which one Cheok was the equivalent of 35.6cm, and one ‘Ri’ equaled 1,000 Cheok units and not 1,800 Cheok units as has usually been considered to be the norm in East Asia. And that is because the latter equation, which would identify one Ri as 1,800 Cheok, would not fit the actual feature of the vestige, as either the Chinese Han-cheok(漢尺, =23cm) or the Goguryeo-cheok(=35.6cm) would not match what we have today if they were multiplied 1,800 times. Only the Goguryeo-cheok system, and when multiplied 1,000 times, would do.
In the Inner (“Naeseong”) fortress, where relics No.4 and No.5 were found, it seems there were three separate construction segments, each of being 6 Ri and 400 cheok units in length. This finding enables us to make a more reasonable assessment of the contents of relic No.5, over which various opinions have been colliding with each other. Only five relics have been found so far, but it seems highly probable that there could have been one more in the Western segment of the Inner fortress, and another in the Southern segment of the Middle fortress. And considering the existence of the Northern (“Bukseong”) fortress, it seems like there would have been total of seven or eight Gakja Seong-seok markers when the Pyeong’yang area’s Jang’an-seong fortress was being constructed.
Most of the fortress walls are now gone, but there is a detailed map of the area created during the Japanese occupation period. In this study, the map is cross-referenced with Google Earth, and verification of the information on the Gakja Seong-seok relics is attempted, using data such as circumference or gross area.
In case of relic No.1, which is generally understood to have been found near Otan, a description on that says “11 Ri(里) to the West” seems to be indicating that relic belonged to the South wall of the Middle (“Jungseong”) fortress. In case of relic No.2, which was found at the Hansa-jeong pavilion at the South side of the Jang’an-seong fortress, there is a line saying “12 Ri to the East.” Considering the length of the actual vestige, it seems like the Goguryeo people used a Cheok scale in which one Cheok was the equivalent of 35.6cm, and one ‘Ri’ equaled 1,000 Cheok units and not 1,800 Cheok units as has usually been considered to be the norm in East Asia. And that is because the latter equation, which would identify one Ri as 1,800 Cheok, would not fit the actual feature of the vestige, as either the Chinese Han-cheok(漢尺, =23cm) or the Goguryeo-cheok(=35.6cm) would not match what we have today if they were multiplied 1,800 times. Only the Goguryeo-cheok system, and when multiplied 1,000 times, would do.
In the Inner (“Naeseong”) fortress, where relics No.4 and No.5 were found, it seems there were three separate construction segments, each of being 6 Ri and 400 cheok units in length. This finding enables us to make a more reasonable assessment of the contents of relic No.5, over which various opinions have been colliding with each other. Only five relics have been found so far, but it seems highly probable that there could have been one more in the Western segment of the Inner fortress, and another in the Southern segment of the Middle fortress. And considering the existence of the Northern (“Bukseong”) fortress, it seems like there would have been total of seven or eight Gakja Seong-seok markers when the Pyeong’yang area’s Jang’an-seong fortress was being constructed.
목차
머리말
1. 평양 장안성 중성 남벽의 고려 축조설 비판
2. 각자성석 공사 구간의 복원과 추정
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선전기 축성기술의 변천 연구
인문과학연구
2017 .03
-
요동지역 고구려성의 입지와 공간분석
한국고고학보
2023 .06
-
고구려 ‘도성제’론의 궤적과 함의
역사와현실
2016 .12
-
철원지역 성곽의 특징과 성격
인문과학연구
2022 .12
-
咸安 城山山城 築造年代에 대하여
목간과문자
2015 .06
-
고구려 평양 장안성의 외성 내 격자형 구획과 도시 형태에 대한 신검토
고구려발해연구
2018 .03
-
6세기 신라의 忠州 진출과 娘城
동아시아고대학
2023 .03
-
고려시대 관련 고고학의 연구 성과와 전망
사학연구
2018 .12
-
倭城과 甑城 名稱考
문물연구
2018 .01
-
평양성 출토 고구려 刻字城石의 판독 및 위치 재검토
사학연구
2017 .09
-
신라·백제의 境界와 아막성과 가잠성
고조선단군학
2021 .12
-
A Reconsideration of the Goguryeo Capital System
Korea Journal
2025 .03
-
한국 중세 성곽의 城壁 설치 방어시설물 연구 -고려시대 城廊, 城頭, 遮城을 중심으로-
인문과학연구
2019 .09
-
발해 거란도 노선 연구
고구려발해연구
2018 .03
-
한국 성곽 문화재 보존 관리의 방안과 과제 - 인천 문학산성, 국가 사적 및 지방 기념물의 비교를 중심으로 -
역사문화연구
2016 .01
-
A Fortress Made in Heaven (Namhansanseong of Gwangju) and the City of a King’s Dreams (Hwaseong Fortress of Suwon)
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2021 .12
-
조선 전기의 고구려 초기 都城 위치 비정과 그 실상
사림
2015 .01
-
高敞 茂長邑城의 保存 및 活用方案
문화사학
2015 .12
-
강원지역 입보용 산악산성의 현황과 특징
백산학보
2024 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-911-000289046