지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The territorial sovereignty over Gando was claimed as a diplomatic issue between Choson(Korea) and Qing(China) in 1880’s. In the state which the issue was not solved by the two parties, Qing and Japan concluded the ‘Gando Agreement’ in 1909 and Choson could not set things right during Japanese colonial rule from 1910 to 1945. After Korea was liberated and divided into two Koreas in 1945 and the two Koreas formed each governments, the Gando issue was considered in an aspect of the unification of nation or territory,
The studies on the Gando issue had been focused on verification for the invalidity of Gando Agreement of 1909 to indicate that present situation which seems that Gando vests in China is illegal or unrightful and so a new valid treaty is required, as good as 1880’s treaty, to replace the invalid Gando Agreement. And also various related studies have proceeded such as on the intention of Japan in the process of the treaty and on the interrelationship between Korea and Gando to confirm and emphasize Korea’s title to Gando.
Meanwhile, the DPRK(North Korea) and the PRC(China) concluded a border treaty in 1962, but they agreed not to make public and not to register with the UN Secretariat. This secret treaty was obtained by chance by South Korea and reviewed its legal aspect with the confirmation of fact. According to the treaty between North Korea and China, Gando belonged to China but North Korea benefited in Cheonji(천지) Lake and Tumen River comparing to the Agreement of 1909. But this treaty is completely valid between the two parties in legal aspect.
Since the treaty between North Korea and China of 1962 nullified or invalidated the agreement between Qing and Japan of 1909, since then or at least after 2000 when the treaty became known to South Korea, the study to verify the invalidity of the agreement of 1909 in South Korea side from a legal point of view.
Based on these criteria, the previous issues and the following issues are classified; the former includes, for example, the invalidity of the Gando Agreement, border-demarcation talks between Choson and Qing in 1880’s, border monument on Beakdusan Mountain and old maps drew by various countries including western European countries. Whereas the fact that the treaty has never registered with the UN Secretariat does not allow the two parties to invoke it before the UN bodies according to Article 102 of the UN Charter and the matter of state succession of the treaty will come into question, which there is no established rule in international law about, therefore, should be examined from the viewpoint of international law policy as an issues of the latter.
The studies on the Gando issue had been focused on verification for the invalidity of Gando Agreement of 1909 to indicate that present situation which seems that Gando vests in China is illegal or unrightful and so a new valid treaty is required, as good as 1880’s treaty, to replace the invalid Gando Agreement. And also various related studies have proceeded such as on the intention of Japan in the process of the treaty and on the interrelationship between Korea and Gando to confirm and emphasize Korea’s title to Gando.
Meanwhile, the DPRK(North Korea) and the PRC(China) concluded a border treaty in 1962, but they agreed not to make public and not to register with the UN Secretariat. This secret treaty was obtained by chance by South Korea and reviewed its legal aspect with the confirmation of fact. According to the treaty between North Korea and China, Gando belonged to China but North Korea benefited in Cheonji(천지) Lake and Tumen River comparing to the Agreement of 1909. But this treaty is completely valid between the two parties in legal aspect.
Since the treaty between North Korea and China of 1962 nullified or invalidated the agreement between Qing and Japan of 1909, since then or at least after 2000 when the treaty became known to South Korea, the study to verify the invalidity of the agreement of 1909 in South Korea side from a legal point of view.
Based on these criteria, the previous issues and the following issues are classified; the former includes, for example, the invalidity of the Gando Agreement, border-demarcation talks between Choson and Qing in 1880’s, border monument on Beakdusan Mountain and old maps drew by various countries including western European countries. Whereas the fact that the treaty has never registered with the UN Secretariat does not allow the two parties to invoke it before the UN bodies according to Article 102 of the UN Charter and the matter of state succession of the treaty will come into question, which there is no established rule in international law about, therefore, should be examined from the viewpoint of international law policy as an issues of the latter.
#간도
#백두산정계비
#감계회담
#청일 간도협약
#조중 변계조약
#을사조약
#조약의 국가승계
#비밀조약
#조약의 등록
#영토분쟁
#Gando
#Baekdusan Boundary Monument
#border-demarcation talk between Korea and China
#Gando Agreement between China and Japan
#Border Treaty between North Korea and China
#State Succession of a Treaty
#Secret Treaty
#Registration of a Treaty
#Territorial Dispute
#Boundary Dispute
목차
1. 서론
2. 간도영유권문제에 있어서 〈조중 변계조약〉의 논리 체계상의 의의
3. 〈조중 변계조약〉이전의 주요 쟁점들
4. 〈조중 변계조약〉이후의 쟁점들
5. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (110)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
간도문제에 있어서 일본의 책임론에 관한 연구
한국지적학회지
2019 .01
-
간도지역 대외무역 연구 : 20세기 초 인천지역과의 비교
인천학연구
2017 .08
-
‘간도협약’에서 간도의 범위, 석을수 그리고 한 · 중 국경 - 부도의 검토 -
대한지리학회지
2022 .08
-
일본의 간도 정책: 일본외교문서를 중심으로(1906~1909)
대한정치학회보
2017 .01
-
헌법합치적 통일과 국제법상 북중경계조약(朝中邊界條約)의 승계
미국헌법연구
2017 .12
-
1959년 중화인민공화국 국경지도집을 통해 본 백두산 지역 국경 인식
대한지리학회지
2023 .12
-
국제법상 조약 등록제도와 비밀조약에 대한 검토 - 통일 후 국경조약의 승계에 대한 문제를 중심으로 -
국제법학회논총
2021 .12
-
What does the China-North Korea relationship look like in the future? : Focusing on China-North Korea Military Alliance
한국동북아논총
2022 .12
-
남북통일 이후 조약의 국가승계에 관한 국제법적 고찰
성균관법학
2019 .12
-
북중관계 변화의 동인과 시진핑시대의 대북정책
국제정치연구
2015 .06
-
러일전쟁과 외교혁명의 국제관계, 1904~1907
군사
2015 .12
-
Why China Has Supported North Korea: An Asymmetrical Dependent Relationship between China and North Korea from 1995 to 2016
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2021 .12
-
중국의 동북3성 북･중 접경지역의 경제협력 및 비즈니스 진출전략 모색에 관한 연구
Journal of China Studies
2017 .01
-
윤영춘의 시 세계와 시의식 연구
청람어문교육
2023 .05
-
China’s Policies toward North Korea’s Nuclear and Missile Programs
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2015 .01
-
북·중 동맹 관계의 변화 전망- 북한의 제3·4·5차 핵실험에 따른 『인민일보』 보도 분석을 중심으로 -
Journal of North Korea Studies
2017 .06
-
조약과 일반적으로 승인된 국제법규의 법적 효력 – 헌법재판소와 대법원의 해석을 중심으로 -
법과 정책연구
2022 .12
-
Why Did We Get China Wrong? Reconsidering the Popular Narrative: China will abandon North Korea
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2016 .01
-
북 · 중 접경지역 현황 및 정책적 시사점 : 북한지역을 중심으로
정책연구
2022 .11
-
샌프란시스코 평화조약의 제3자적 효력과 독도영유권
인문사회 21
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0