메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
임혜진 (Catholic University of Daegu) 김정규 (Catholic University of Daegu) 최철희 (Catholic University of Daegu) 최성희 (Catholic University of Daegu)
저널정보
한국언어치료학회 한국언어치료학회 학술발표대회 논문집 한국언어치료학회·한국언어청감임상학회 2016년도 제5회 공동학술대회 발표논문집
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
302 - 306 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Subjective auditory perceptual assessment by the trained clinician’s ear are known as the gold standard for assessment of voice impairment. However is no consensus among experts on terminology in Korea. The purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary study to develop the standardized guideline for terminology that is necessary to describe auditory perception qualitatively and quantitatively in voice disorders of Korea. Methods: At first, a subjective questionnaire for the Korean translation and definition of 25 auditory perceptual assessment terms proposed by Titze was answered by six speech-language pathologists. In second, a new questionnaire that was reconstructed with objective items based on the responses to the first questionnaire was completed by 14 experts who have experience on voice disorder for more than 10years in Korea. In both questionnaires, the necessity of 32 auditory perceptual assessment terms that were selected among the 25 terms by Titze, GRBAS and CAPE-V was surveyed. Results: The consensus on Korean translation of auditory perceptual assessment terms was moderate (52.6%) between exerts. The terms ‘rough’ and ‘shimmer’ demonstrated highest consensus of 85.7%. The consensus on Korean definition of auditory perceptual assessment terms was also moderate (61.6%). The term ‘yawny’ showed complete consensus (100%). The necessity of auditory perceptual assessment terms vaired with terms, but the consensus on the necessity was high. Conclusions: It is necessary to develop and apply various standardized vocabulary terms for clinical evaluation that can express pathology and physiological characteristics during vocalization. In addition, despite the fact that there are a lot of auditory-perceptual terms, there is a lack of knowledge about voice quality terms, suggesting the need to promote and educate the developed voice quality terms.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-037-003330636