음성 장애에서 청지각적 평정 용어에 대한 전문가 일치도

임혜진; 김정규; 장규호; 김덕수; 최철희; 최성희

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 임혜진 김정규 장규호 김덕수 최철희 최성희

저널정보: 대한이비인후과학회 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학 제60권 제12호

발행연도: 2017.1

수록면: 653 - 663 (11page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

2017

음성장애에서 청지각적 평정 용어의 분류 및 정의에 대한 일치도

임혜진 , 최철희 , 김정규 외 1명 대한음성언어의학회 학술대회 2017.01 학술대회자료

음성 장애에서 청지각적 평정 용어에 대한 전문가 일치도

임혜진 , 김정규 , 장규호 외 3명 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지 2017.01 학술저널

2016

음성장애에서 청지각적 평정 용어에 대한 전문가 일치도

임혜진 , 김정규 , 최철희 외 1명 한국언어치료학회 학술발표대회 논문집 2016.12 학술대회자료

이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Background and Objectives The purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary study to develop a standardized guideline for terminology necessary to describe auditory perception qualitatively and quantitatively in voice disorders in the Korean language. Subjects and Method At first, a subjective questionnaire for Korean translation and definition of 25 auditory perceptual assessment terms proposed by Titze was answered by six speech-language pathologists. Secondly, a new questionnaire that was reconstructed with objective items based on the responses to the first questionnaire was completed by 14 experts who had experience on voice disorder for more than 10 years in Korea. In both questionnaires, the necessity of 32 auditory perceptual assessment terms selected from the 25 terms defined by Titze, GRBAS and CAPE-V was surveyed. Results The consensus on the Korean translation of auditory perceptual assessment terms was moderate (52.6%) between experts. The terms ‘rough’ and ‘shimmer’ demonstrated highest consensus of 85.7%. The consensus on Korean definition of auditory perceptual assessment terms was also moderate (61.6%). The term ‘yawny’ showed complete consensus (100%). The necessity of auditory perceptual assessment terms varied with terms, but showed high consensus. Conclusion It is necessary to develop and apply various standardized vocabulary terms for clinical evaluation so that they can express pathology and physiological characteristics during vocalization. In addition, despite the fact that there are a lot of auditory-perceptual terms, there is a lack of knowledge about voice quality terms, suggesting the need to promote and educate the developed voice quality terms. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2017;60(12):653-63

#Auditory-perceptual judgment #Voice disorder #Voice quality.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

Adachi S / 1999 / An acoustical study of sound production in biphonic singing, Xoomij / J Acoust Soc Am 105 (5) : 2920 ~ 2932

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association / / CAPE-V ASHA special interest division 3, Voice and voice disorder

Gerratt BR / 2001 / Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis / J Acoust Soc Am 110 (5 Pt 1) : 2560 ~ 2566

Hirano M / 1981 / Clinical examination of voice / Springer Verlag

Kent RD / 2000 / Voice quality measurement / Singular Publishing

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!