메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤한나 (국민대학교) 김성래 (국민대학교) 이지원 (국민대학교) 양지현 (국민대학교)
저널정보
한국자동차공학회 한국자동차공학회논문집 한국자동차공학회논문집 제26권 제4호
발행연도
2018.7
수록면
464 - 475 (12page)
DOI
10.7467/KSAE.2018.26.4.464

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With the dawn of the era of automated vehicles and the recent development of key technology in the automated driving system, there is a rising demand for solving the safety issue of control take-over along with legal system improvement and social acceptability. In order to secure the control take-over safety in Level 3 automated vehicles, which are expected to be commercialized, this paper seeks to analyze the automation mode disengagement situations and its causes in order to provide the foundation necessary to develop the take-over evaluation scenario and evaluation standard. The Autonomous Driving Disengagement Reports submitted to the U.S. CA Department of Motor Vehicles(DMV) were analyzed as follows: The analysis was implemented in the phases of securing temporary operational rule and disengagement report data; data conversion and integrated data building for easy data analysis of the secured disengagement report data; classification of disengagement situations and causes according to the three road traffic factors; and implementation of descriptive statistical analysis on the classified disengagement situations. From September 2014 to November 2016, 7 selected companies were found to have a total of 3,271 times of automated driving mode disengagement. Vehicle factor, which consisted of the automated driving system and automated vehicle, accounted for 54 %; environmental factor, which consisted of traffic participants, road, weather, traffic flow, and obstacle, accounted for 25 %; and human factor, which consisted of subjective inconvenience, accounted for 22 %. Based on the findings, the situation where Level 3 automated vehicles had the driving right then transferred the control regardless of the driver’s status was classified into: 1) automated vehicle hardware failure; 2) automated driving system software failure; and 3) operational design domain deviation cases for structuralization.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 자율주행모드 해제 개념 정의
3. 자율주행모드 해제보고서 분석 방법
4. 자율주행모드 해제원인 분석 결과
5. 결론
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0