지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 215 (215page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Research Background
It has been about 20 years since the direct payment schemes were implemented in Korea and the schemes have played an essential role in the agricultural sector as a policy instrument. However, there have been some skeptical views on the effectiveness of the direct payment schemes, especially on whether the purpose of the schemes at the time of introduction is still valid. The goal of this study consists of two parts: to evaluate the effectiveness of the schemes and suggest an improvement direction for the current direct payment schemes in the first year and to set up a specific plan, especially for the schemes on rice paddies (Fixed and Variable Rice Direct Payment; FRDP and VRDP) and dry fields (Upland Field Direct Payment; UFDP), considering the results of the first-year study in the second and last year.
Research Methodology
In this study, several research methodologies are applied depending on the target subjects as below.
· Literature review and expert group meetings on the pollution levels of agricultural land and water.
· Statistical analysis of farm household economy and food balance sheets
· Questionnaires on the status of farm input use, farmers" acceptance rate for the revised cross-compliance, and willingness-to-pay on agricultural multifunctionality depending on whether the consumers get educated about the multifunctionality by using choice experiments.
Conclusion and Implication
The Farmland Management Direct Payment scheme (FMDP) should include FRDP, UFDP, and some of VRDP and the payments from the scheme are paid to farmers as a reward for providing the agricultural multifunctionality, especially for food security, environmental preservation, and sustainable agriculture.
FMDP aims to relieve the unequal distribution of the agricultural budget between direct payments for rice paddies and the others and also eliminate the extra incentive for rice production. The cross-compliance (CC) for FMDP is as follows: First, farmers should preserve their farmland to cultivate crops. Second, farmers should record the use of agro-materials, especially fertilizer and chemicals. Third, farmers should participate in the educational courses about multifunctionality and cross-compliance. Last, dry field farmers should apply some specific agricultural techniques to reduce soil erosion by water.
The acceptance rate for the suggested cross-compliance of FMDP is more than 80%, which means the CC of FMDP is acceptable and realizable to farmers. This is because more than 60% of farmers have already recorded their agricultural input use and they recognize that the educational course is useful for not only getting the remuneration of the direct payment scheme but also increasing their agricultural productivity.
To estimate the appropriate remuneration ratio between the direct payments for rice paddies and UFDP, the farmer"s family labor income and the contribution ratio of those farmlands for annual food supply per capita per day are considered. Based on the results, the remuneration ratio between those two schemes should be the same, considering the benefit-cost efficiency of carrying out the policy, even though the ratio of UFDP is slightly higher in both criteria.
To conduct FMDP, it is a prerequisite for taxpayers or interest groups to understand the importance of agricultural multifunctionality and to agree with supporting farmers to provide ‘more’ multifunctionality. To figure out the way for taxpayers to support FMDP, a survey was conducted based on choice experiments. The result shows that the participants who got education about agricultural multifunctionality show a 20% higher WTP for multifunctionality compared to the participants who did not.
It has been about 20 years since the direct payment schemes were implemented in Korea and the schemes have played an essential role in the agricultural sector as a policy instrument. However, there have been some skeptical views on the effectiveness of the direct payment schemes, especially on whether the purpose of the schemes at the time of introduction is still valid. The goal of this study consists of two parts: to evaluate the effectiveness of the schemes and suggest an improvement direction for the current direct payment schemes in the first year and to set up a specific plan, especially for the schemes on rice paddies (Fixed and Variable Rice Direct Payment; FRDP and VRDP) and dry fields (Upland Field Direct Payment; UFDP), considering the results of the first-year study in the second and last year.
Research Methodology
In this study, several research methodologies are applied depending on the target subjects as below.
· Literature review and expert group meetings on the pollution levels of agricultural land and water.
· Statistical analysis of farm household economy and food balance sheets
· Questionnaires on the status of farm input use, farmers" acceptance rate for the revised cross-compliance, and willingness-to-pay on agricultural multifunctionality depending on whether the consumers get educated about the multifunctionality by using choice experiments.
Conclusion and Implication
The Farmland Management Direct Payment scheme (FMDP) should include FRDP, UFDP, and some of VRDP and the payments from the scheme are paid to farmers as a reward for providing the agricultural multifunctionality, especially for food security, environmental preservation, and sustainable agriculture.
FMDP aims to relieve the unequal distribution of the agricultural budget between direct payments for rice paddies and the others and also eliminate the extra incentive for rice production. The cross-compliance (CC) for FMDP is as follows: First, farmers should preserve their farmland to cultivate crops. Second, farmers should record the use of agro-materials, especially fertilizer and chemicals. Third, farmers should participate in the educational courses about multifunctionality and cross-compliance. Last, dry field farmers should apply some specific agricultural techniques to reduce soil erosion by water.
The acceptance rate for the suggested cross-compliance of FMDP is more than 80%, which means the CC of FMDP is acceptable and realizable to farmers. This is because more than 60% of farmers have already recorded their agricultural input use and they recognize that the educational course is useful for not only getting the remuneration of the direct payment scheme but also increasing their agricultural productivity.
To estimate the appropriate remuneration ratio between the direct payments for rice paddies and UFDP, the farmer"s family labor income and the contribution ratio of those farmlands for annual food supply per capita per day are considered. Based on the results, the remuneration ratio between those two schemes should be the same, considering the benefit-cost efficiency of carrying out the policy, even though the ratio of UFDP is slightly higher in both criteria.
To conduct FMDP, it is a prerequisite for taxpayers or interest groups to understand the importance of agricultural multifunctionality and to agree with supporting farmers to provide ‘more’ multifunctionality. To figure out the way for taxpayers to support FMDP, a survey was conducted based on choice experiments. The result shows that the participants who got education about agricultural multifunctionality show a 20% higher WTP for multifunctionality compared to the participants who did not.
목차
[표지]
[차례]
표 차례
그림 차례
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
2. 선행연구 검토
3. 연구내용과 범위
[제2장 직불제 도입과 운용]
1. 직불제 도입 배경과 목적
2. 직불제 운용 현황과 성과 평가
[제3장 직불제 개편의 필요성과 개편안]
1. 직불제 문제점과 개편의 필요성
2. 전체 직불제 개편안
[제4장 농지관리직불제 도입 방안]
1. 농지관리직불 도입을 위한 접근 방향
2. 의무이행사항 설정
3. 지급 대상과 단가 조정
4. 이행 점검과 기반 조성
5. 향후과제
[제5장 요약 및 결론]
1. 직불제 성과 평가
2. 직불제 개편의 필요성
3. 현재 직불제의 개편안
4. 농지관리직불 구체화 방안
5. 향후과제
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Achievements and Limitations of the Public-purpose Direct Payment Program in Korea
Journal of Safety and Crisis Management
2023 .05
-
How much do decoupled fixed direct payments affect Korean rice production?
재정정책논집
2022 .12
-
고령화시대 청년 창업농업인 육성체계 개선방안
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2017 .10
-
경영이양직접지불제가 고령농의 영농은퇴에 미치는 영향 분석 : 쌀 재배 농가를 중심으로
농업경영.정책연구
2017 .01
-
농민수당의 지역 경제 파급효과 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2022 .09
-
직접지불제 효과 분석과 개선 방안 연구(1/2차년도)
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2016 .12
-
공익직불제의 정책효과 분석: 소득효과와 소득분배 효과를 중심으로
농업경제연구
2022 .03
-
농업직불금 제도의 정책구조와 집행 분석: 충남지역을 사례로
농촌사회
2015 .12
-
청년 농업인 지원 정책 방향에 관한 연구 - 충청남도 사례 -
농촌지도와 개발
2018 .01
-
청년농업인의 영농다각화 활동 선택 결정요인 분석
농촌계획
2019 .01
-
청년농업인의 자립의지와 영농지속성에서 가족지지의 매개효과 분석
농촌계획
2021 .01
-
농업·농촌에 대한 2018년 국민의식 조사 결과
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2019 .03
-
AHP와 IPA를 활용한 청년농업인 지원정책의 우선순위 연구
식품유통연구
2024 .09
-
농업회계기록의 실태 및 활성화 방안
농업경영.정책연구
2018 .01
-
쌀 수입보험으로 변동직불제를 대체할 수 있을까?
농업경영.정책연구
2015 .01
-
일본 홋카이도 비라토리정의 신규취농 지원정책과 마을조직의 역할
농촌지도와 개발
2018 .01
-
경기도 청년농부 육성 지원방안
정책연구
2018 .06
-
기후변화와 농업재해, 보상제도의 필요성
환경법과 정책
2018 .02
-
임대형 스마트팜의 유치가 청년농업인 육성 및 지역 정착에 미치는 영행에 관한 기초 연구
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2024 .11
-
소농직불금 지급기준의 적정성 및 소득분배 효과 분석
농업경제연구
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-522-001759202