메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
LA Mee Ryung
저널정보
대외경제정책연구원 [KIEP] KIEP Opinions Opinions 제126권
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
0 - 0 (1page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On November 14, 2017, the heads of RCEP Participating Countries (RPCs) announced 2018 as the new target year to conclude the RCEP negotiations. The RPCs had originally tried to achieve a substantial conclusion for the RCEP by the end of 2017, in time for ASEAN's milestone 50th anniversary, but as of yet such a substantial conclusion still remains a goal. According to the GVC analyses, the vertical specialization between China, Japan and Korea (CJK) has deepened in the manufacturing sector, and some ASEAN countries ‒ e.g., Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam ‒ have been incorporated into the production networks of CJK. Among RPCs, the value-added in trade which crosses borders more than twice holds particularly high value in the "electrical and optical equipment" sector, and trade that Korea is a party to shows a relatively high ratio of multiple crossed value-added terms to its gross trade. With the development of regional value chains in the RCEP bloc, the countries have become more interconnected and specialized in stages of production rather than in industries. If the RCEP lowers the trade barriers significantly, productivity gains can be expected by improving the efficiency of the value chain in the region. Given that mutual benefits of RPCs can be achieved on the same basis from the point of GVCs, RPCs could be brought closer to substantial conclusion by approaching from a GVC perspective.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0