지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제106호
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 249 - 289 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2017.12.106.249
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The local administrative system of Joseon began with institutional reforms at the end of the Goryeo period, and continued with the objective to reinforce a centralized ruling structure. In order to overcome the problems manifested in the late Goryeo dynasty’s local governance, Joseon conducted reforms on its local administration system, and tried to establish a unilateral control of local regions by sending local prefects to all of those regions.
Such process, from the early half of the Joseon period during which this objective was pursued, can be examined through many aspects including the so-called Gwanchal-sa figures’ Gu’im-je(久任制) institution. This was a conscious effort realized in the form of a dynastic policy concerning local ruling, which notably surfaced during the reigns of king Sejong and Jungjong. It was a solution for reinforced central control, but the way it was employed slightly differed between the reigns of those two kings.
For example, in the early days of king Jungjong’s reign, the cause of edification was considered more heavily in the task of enhancing local governing. At the time, the central government figured that the reason the local regions were being plagued by poverty and instability was because vulgar customs in those areas were never sufficiently corrected. So during King Jungjong’s reign, the central government wanted to approach and resolve the matter by utilizing the Gwanchal-sa magistrates, who were by definition in charge of local education.
In an attempt to solve local problems, during the reign of king Jungjong several methods were employed, such as having candidates for governmental seats recommended from the local regions, honoring & rewarding people filial to their parents as well as widows who remained dedicated to their deceased husbands, and implementing Hyang’yak codes in local areas. In the early years of Jungjong’s reign, along with these methods the Gu’im-je institution for the Gwanchl-sa magistrates was also employed, so that they could be more willing and aggressive in spotting and solving local issues through an administrative platform and also on their own. In the process, the Gwanchal-sa magistrates were provided with a status as the beings in charge of enlightening local regions, and as a result established themselves as ‘Pung’hwa-gwan(風化官)’ officers, in charge of correcting and purifying local customs and conventional practices.
Such process, from the early half of the Joseon period during which this objective was pursued, can be examined through many aspects including the so-called Gwanchal-sa figures’ Gu’im-je(久任制) institution. This was a conscious effort realized in the form of a dynastic policy concerning local ruling, which notably surfaced during the reigns of king Sejong and Jungjong. It was a solution for reinforced central control, but the way it was employed slightly differed between the reigns of those two kings.
For example, in the early days of king Jungjong’s reign, the cause of edification was considered more heavily in the task of enhancing local governing. At the time, the central government figured that the reason the local regions were being plagued by poverty and instability was because vulgar customs in those areas were never sufficiently corrected. So during King Jungjong’s reign, the central government wanted to approach and resolve the matter by utilizing the Gwanchal-sa magistrates, who were by definition in charge of local education.
In an attempt to solve local problems, during the reign of king Jungjong several methods were employed, such as having candidates for governmental seats recommended from the local regions, honoring & rewarding people filial to their parents as well as widows who remained dedicated to their deceased husbands, and implementing Hyang’yak codes in local areas. In the early years of Jungjong’s reign, along with these methods the Gu’im-je institution for the Gwanchl-sa magistrates was also employed, so that they could be more willing and aggressive in spotting and solving local issues through an administrative platform and also on their own. In the process, the Gwanchal-sa magistrates were provided with a status as the beings in charge of enlightening local regions, and as a result established themselves as ‘Pung’hwa-gwan(風化官)’ officers, in charge of correcting and purifying local customs and conventional practices.
목차
머리말
1. 지방통치의 구상과 관찰사 구임제(久任制)
2. 중종대 관찰사의 업무와 교화의 당위성 부여
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중종대(中宗代) 음악정책의 중흥과 개혁
온지논총
2022 .01
-
中宗 時代 중앙관료의 『尙書』 이해 - 『朝鮮王朝實錄』에 수록된 經筵을 중심으로 -
南冥學硏究
2021 .01
-
조선 중종 후반기 성균관 유생들의 학풍 문제
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
신라 하대 경장(京匠)의 동향 : 특히 와장(瓦匠)을 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2015 .12
-
남송 전기 ‘태평 분식’의 정치적 배경과 전개 양상
동양사학연구
2019 .12
-
고려 후기~조선 전기 수령 중심 군현 편제의 전개와 연속성
역사비평
2017 .08
-
1960년대 박정희 정부의 지역통치체계 재편과 ‘유지집단’의 활동 : 충청북도 괴산군 증평읍 사례를 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
중종 대 사회 질서 구축과 효행 정책
서강인문논총
2023 .04
-
조선초기 호장(戶長)의 향촌 지배와 그 변화
한국사연구
2019 .12
-
조선시대 유교적 상장례 정착으로 보는 ‘유교화’ 과정 : 연산군·중종대 상기(喪期) 관련 논의를 중심으로
서강인문논총
2017 .12
-
中宗 연간 문집 편찬‧간행 양상과 그 의미 - 前代 문인의 문집을 중심으로
고전문학연구
2019 .01
-
조선 중종 전반기 성균관 유생들의 사습(士習) 논란
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
금석문을 통해 본 6세기 신라 법제와 지방민 인식 변화
한국고대사연구
2019 .03
-
중국 지방정부의 재정위기(Financial Crisis) 유발행위의 분석
동아인문학
2016 .12
-
숙종대의 『여지승람』 수정증보 사업과 그 의미
동방학지
2019 .01
-
로컬 인식의 탈중심화를 위한 언어문화적 수행 - 지역 일상어의 문학적 변용에 따른 인식의 재구조화 가능성을 중심으로 -
인문과학연구
2022 .07
-
한국 중세인들의 풍수관에 대한 새로운 해석 : 장지연, <고려·조선 국도풍수론과 정치이념> (신구문화사, 2015)
역사와현실
2016 .09
-
연산군대 금표 설치와 경기의 농산물 유통
역사와현실
2021 .09
-
연산군·중종대 조선의 歧州衛 대책
한국사연구
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001746731