지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, the role played by the Gwanchal-sa prefects during the processing of the appeals(呈訴) is examined, based upon the Soji(所志) appeal materials that were filed during the 15th century.
According to the Gyeongguk Daejeon Code of Law, there were regulations regarding the processing of appeals, which dictated the process to be handled by low-level clerks prior to being sent to the officials at the upper levels. Yet during the consolidation phase of national operations in the early days of the Joseon dynasty, lawsuits involving Nobi worker-related issues were placed under the jurisdiction of the Gwanchal-sa prefects, as they were considered as special matters which had to be resolved appropriately in order to maintain stability in the government’s ruling. During the early days of the government, the Gwanchal-sa prefects used to patrol the region(巡行) under their jurisdiction by scheduling regular tours of the area, and therefore remained in frequent contacts with the general population. That was what prompted the decision to place the Nobi worker-related lawsuits under the Gwanchal-sa prefects’ jurisdiction in the first place.
When the appeals were delivered to the Gwanchal-sa prefect, the prefect would not deal with it himself, and instead would have it sent to the local Suryeong magistrates of the Gun and Hyeon units to be examined and processed. The results of the processing would be reported back to the Gwanchal-sa prefect, and mirrored in the prefect’s evaluations of the magistrates’ conducts(考課). The method of transferring appeals from the Gwanchal-sa prefect to the Suryeong magistrates was called as Euisong(議送).
Previously, the Gwanchal-sa prefects have only been believed to have served as a secondary body for processing the appeals, and the nature of the Euisong practice was examined only in that regard. Yet according to the analysis of the 15th century Soji appeal materials, the special law enacted to deal with the Nobi worker-related lawsuits in the early days of the dynasty, along with the patrolling practice of the Gwanchal-sa prefects, enabled the Gwanchal-sa prefects to have an active and also a leading role in dealing with and processing Nobi worker-related lawsuits.
According to the Gyeongguk Daejeon Code of Law, there were regulations regarding the processing of appeals, which dictated the process to be handled by low-level clerks prior to being sent to the officials at the upper levels. Yet during the consolidation phase of national operations in the early days of the Joseon dynasty, lawsuits involving Nobi worker-related issues were placed under the jurisdiction of the Gwanchal-sa prefects, as they were considered as special matters which had to be resolved appropriately in order to maintain stability in the government’s ruling. During the early days of the government, the Gwanchal-sa prefects used to patrol the region(巡行) under their jurisdiction by scheduling regular tours of the area, and therefore remained in frequent contacts with the general population. That was what prompted the decision to place the Nobi worker-related lawsuits under the Gwanchal-sa prefects’ jurisdiction in the first place.
When the appeals were delivered to the Gwanchal-sa prefect, the prefect would not deal with it himself, and instead would have it sent to the local Suryeong magistrates of the Gun and Hyeon units to be examined and processed. The results of the processing would be reported back to the Gwanchal-sa prefect, and mirrored in the prefect’s evaluations of the magistrates’ conducts(考課). The method of transferring appeals from the Gwanchal-sa prefect to the Suryeong magistrates was called as Euisong(議送).
Previously, the Gwanchal-sa prefects have only been believed to have served as a secondary body for processing the appeals, and the nature of the Euisong practice was examined only in that regard. Yet according to the analysis of the 15th century Soji appeal materials, the special law enacted to deal with the Nobi worker-related lawsuits in the early days of the dynasty, along with the patrolling practice of the Gwanchal-sa prefects, enabled the Gwanchal-sa prefects to have an active and also a leading role in dealing with and processing Nobi worker-related lawsuits.
목차
머리말
1. 고문서에 나타난 15세기 정소(呈訴) 실상
2. 관찰사의 업무와 소지(所志) 접수
3. 관찰사의 소지 처리방식과 의송(議送)
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중종대 초기 관찰사의 ‘풍화관(風化官)’ 활동
역사와현실
2017 .12
-
한 · 일 영화의 감성 비교 : 『용의자X의 헌신』의 영화적 재현을 중심으로
일본문화학보
2017 .08
-
16세기 請願書의 처리절차와 議送의 의미
古文書硏究
2004 .01
-
조선초기 사노비 정한법(定限法) 논의와 그 성격
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
16, 17세기 노양처병산법(奴良妻幷産法)과 노비소송
역사와현실
2008 .03
-
조선후기 奴婢賣買 자료를 통해 본 奴婢의 사회ㆍ경제적 성격과 奴婢價의 변동
한국민족문화
2008 .04
-
남송말 지방행정과 添差通判 ―黃震의 廣德軍 添差通判 활동을 중심으로―
동양학
2016 .01
-
안정복의 民願政策과 官民疏通
古文書硏究
2013 .01
-
道家思想对唐代小说的影响: 以 ≪南柯太守传≫ 等为中心
중국소설논총
2009 .01
-
14-15세기 고문서 자료에 나타난 지방행정체계- ‘陳省’의 발급과 송부체계를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2006 .01
-
고전서사에 형상화된 노비의 존재성 탐구
돈암어문학
2017 .06
-
논문:16세기 성주목 향리의 조직구조와 사회적 위상 - 『묵재일기』를 중심으로
역사와현실
2003 .09
-
‘근세’ 동아시아의 정치문화와 직소
역사비평
2016 .11
-
記事의 양식적 특성과 작품 세계
동방한문학
2009 .01
-
대명률과 조선 중기 형률상의 신분 차별
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
조선후기 소송을 통해 본 법과 사회
동양사학연구
2013 .06
-
호적대장을 통해 본 조선후기 노비층의 증감현상― 대구부 동상면을 중심으로
대동문화연구
2015 .01
-
『楡岾寺本末寺誌』에 대한 연구 : 「淸平寺誌」를 중심으로
인문과학연구
2010 .03
-
조선시대 詞訟재판의 두 양태- 해남윤씨가 소장 決訟立案을 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015474454