메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hannah S. An (Torch Trinity Graduate University)
저널정보
대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제41호
발행연도
2017.10
수록면
280 - 303 (24page)
DOI
10.28977/jbtr.2017.10.41.280

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the publication of E. J. Epp’s 1966 landmark study, The Theological Tendency of Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis in Acts, it has elicited varied reactions among New Testament textual critics. A recent publication of Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 4986 (P‰<SUP>127</SUP>), not considered in Epp’s original work, and J. Ruis-Camps and J. Read-Heimerdinger’s fresh analysis on the Bezan text of Acts require a synchronic reappraisal of Epp’s thesis. Based on G. Gäbel’s finding that both Codex Bezae (D05) and ‰P‰<SUP>127</SUP> descend from a similar textual base, this article evaluates instances of “singular” readings in D05 and P‰<SUP>127</SUP> in light of Epp’s proposition that the distinctive D-variants have “anti-Judaic tendencies.” A comparison of the most representative cases in Acts 10–17 indicates that P‰<SUP>127</SUP> closely adheres to the ideological emphases in the D05, with only minor variations. This partially confirms Epp’s notion about a theologically motivated emphasis running through the D-variants. However, a careful examination of the D-texts reveals that the ideological orientation of the textual accretion of Acts 10–17 cannot be strictly categorized as either “Gentile Christian” (Epp) or “Jewish” (Ruis-Camps and Read-Heimerdinger). Literary allusions to both Testaments, especially relating to Gentile inclusion, point to a D-text scribe, familiar with Jewish and Christian canons, whose ideal was the “restored Israel” in which Jewish converts embraced Gentile believers in one faith. This article claims that the apostolic decree in the D-text, with the negative golden rule, preserves one of the early literary allusions to Leviticus 17, 18, and 19, focusing on Gentile converts (Lev 19:18, 34).

목차

1. Introduction
2. Paradoxical Duality of Omission and Expansion: Text-critical Implication of P¹²⁷ in the Reading of Acts
3. Conclusion
〈References〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-233-001320658