지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For the purpose of providing a stable supply of safe agricultural products and high quality foods and promoting the sustainable development of the agricultural industry and rural economies,「Framework Act on Agriculture, Rural Community, and Food Industry」enacted. However, despite these efforts, both laws do not provide enough support regarding the multifunctionality of agriculture. On the other hand, advanced countries in agriculture have reflected justifications regarding the need to support agriculture and rural communities in its laws to maintain multifunctionality in agriculture and rural communities. Based on such laws, these countries have continually cultivated greater national understanding and have utilized such consensus building practices as an impetus for further supporting agriculture and rural communities. In particular, in the case of Japan, based on its 1999 enactment of the 「Framework Act On Food, Agriculture, and Rural Communities」, the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural communities have been maintained and strengthened through a number of policies. In light of this, Japan, considered a country having similar climates and national land conditions to South Korea, was selected for further review of its handling of the issue of multifunctionality, and its implications for South Korea were further suggested in this study.
A summary of this is as follows. First, in Japan, related laws clearly recognize and promote the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural communities that have not been recognized in the past. Specifically, the laws emphasize the multifunctionality of agriculture associated with the functions of conserving national land, developing sources of water, conserving the natural environment, forming favorable scenery, and passing down culture. The laws also stipulate the need for the ‘continual development of agriculture based on things that maintain and promote natural cycling functions.’ In reference to this, South Korea must revise its regulatory framework to reflect and promote aspects regarding multifunctionality and the public benefit. Second, in Japan, when the Framework Act on Food, Agriculture, and Rural Communities was established, the law provided a means for the development of specific policies. In reference to this, South Korea, should not limit its regulations to provide abstract ideologies or directions regarding multifunctionality, but establish regulations that entail legally binding measures. Third, in the case of South Korea, Basic Plans are not required and because of this, the development of comprehensive and systematic policies is not being undertaken. In light of this, regulations that require the establishment of a Basic Plan are needed at least for the purposes of acquiring greater transparency of the policies. Fourth, the Japanese system of direct payment is considered an effective means of appropriately maintaining agricultural production activities and thus is a means of contributing to maintaining multifunctionality. For the purposes of providing a stable supply of food to the people and in consideration of the contribution of agriculture on land conservation, environmental protection, and flood prevention functions, such multifunctional aspects need to further be promoted through direct payment systems. Fifth, as it is the case in Japan, during negotiations regarding the opening of agricultural markets, the concept of multifunctionality needs to be utilized as a reason for providing great support to agriculture. In order to do so, multifunctionality must be clearly established in related laws and further efforts to uncover the theoretical basis for doing so need to be undertaken.
A summary of this is as follows. First, in Japan, related laws clearly recognize and promote the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural communities that have not been recognized in the past. Specifically, the laws emphasize the multifunctionality of agriculture associated with the functions of conserving national land, developing sources of water, conserving the natural environment, forming favorable scenery, and passing down culture. The laws also stipulate the need for the ‘continual development of agriculture based on things that maintain and promote natural cycling functions.’ In reference to this, South Korea must revise its regulatory framework to reflect and promote aspects regarding multifunctionality and the public benefit. Second, in Japan, when the Framework Act on Food, Agriculture, and Rural Communities was established, the law provided a means for the development of specific policies. In reference to this, South Korea, should not limit its regulations to provide abstract ideologies or directions regarding multifunctionality, but establish regulations that entail legally binding measures. Third, in the case of South Korea, Basic Plans are not required and because of this, the development of comprehensive and systematic policies is not being undertaken. In light of this, regulations that require the establishment of a Basic Plan are needed at least for the purposes of acquiring greater transparency of the policies. Fourth, the Japanese system of direct payment is considered an effective means of appropriately maintaining agricultural production activities and thus is a means of contributing to maintaining multifunctionality. For the purposes of providing a stable supply of food to the people and in consideration of the contribution of agriculture on land conservation, environmental protection, and flood prevention functions, such multifunctional aspects need to further be promoted through direct payment systems. Fifth, as it is the case in Japan, during negotiations regarding the opening of agricultural markets, the concept of multifunctionality needs to be utilized as a reason for providing great support to agriculture. In order to do so, multifunctionality must be clearly established in related laws and further efforts to uncover the theoretical basis for doing so need to be undertaken.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 다면적 기능의 의의와 특징
Ⅲ. 농업의 다면적 기능과 직접지불제도
Ⅳ. 요약 및 시사점
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태곤 / 2014 / 일본의 새로운 농업보호와 다원적 기능 직불제 / 세계농업 (170)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태곤 / 2014 / 일본의 직접지불제 개혁 ; 쌀 직불제 감축과 다원적 기능 직불제 확충 / 농정연구 (51)
[보고서] - 배민식 / 1996 / 일본의 새로운 ｢농업기본법｣ 제정 동향
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 사동천 / 2008 / 개정 ｢농업･농촌 및 식품산업기본법｣에 관한 고찰 / 법학논총 15 (2)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 임정빈 / 2003 / 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 국제적 논의 내용과 주요 쟁점 / 농업생명과학연구 37 (3)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태곤 / 2014 / 일본의 직접지불제 개혁 ; 쌀 직불제 감축과 다원적 기능 직불제 확충 / 농정연구 (51)
[보고서] - 배민식 / 1996 / 일본의 새로운 ｢농업기본법｣ 제정 동향
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 사동천 / 2008 / 개정 ｢농업･농촌 및 식품산업기본법｣에 관한 고찰 / 법학논총 15 (2)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 임정빈 / 2003 / 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 국제적 논의 내용과 주요 쟁점 / 농업생명과학연구 37 (3)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Agriculture in Korea 2020
한국농촌경제연구원 기타연구보고
2020 .12
-
농업ㆍ농촌의 사회ㆍ문화적 기능 가치 평가
농촌계획
2020 .01
-
경기도 농업·농촌 및 식품산업 발전 방향
정책연구
2018 .10
-
농업의 다원적 기능 확충 방향과 과제
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2019 .02
-
도농복합지역내 도시농업의 추진방안에 관한 연구: 포항시 중심으로
경영컨설팅연구
2020 .01
-
농업·농촌에 대한 2020년 국민의식 조사 결과
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2020 .12
-
농업·농촌에 대한 2022년 국민의식 조사 결과
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2022 .12
-
농업·농촌에 대한 2019년 국민의식 조사 결과
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2019 .12
-
생태, 경관, 참여 측면의 도시농업 활성화 방안 모색 : 인구집단 특성과 개인의 주관적 인식 분석을 중심으로
지역연구
2018 .12
-
2040 한국 농업 미래 시나리오 연구
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2022 .10
-
2007~2015 개정 교육과정기의 초·중등학교 교양농업교육 내용 분석
실과교육연구
2016 .01
-
농업의 재구성과 농촌사회 변화 : 홍성군 홍동면·장곡면 사례를 중심으로
농촌사회
2020 .10
-
한국농업의 미래성장을 위한 농업부문 투자 활성화 방안(1/2차년도)
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2016 .12
-
한국농업의 미래성장을 위한 농업부문 투자 활성화 방안(2/2차년도)
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2017 .12
-
사회적농업을 통한 공동체 돌봄의 실현 조건
지역사회연구
2022 .03
-
농업·농촌의 가치 확산과 새로운 농정패러다임 구축
한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고
2017 .03
-
바이오소재농업 활성화 방안
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2022 .10
-
현행 공익직불제가 저탄소 농업면적의 확대에 기여할 수 있을까?: 저탄소 유기농업 실천농가의 경영성과 분석
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2022 .12
-
기후스마트농업의 실태진단과 과제
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2016 .10
-
융복합 농산업화 모델 유형별 잠재가능성 분석- 밭작물 주산단지를 중심으로 -
농촌계획
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[신정부의 농정방향 시리즈(7)] 부가가치를 창출하는 농촌개발정책
오현석
시선집중 GSnJ
2017
.05
미국의 농업교육 변화 동향과 시사점
마상진
,
최세균
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2014
.01
지방소멸에 대응한 농촌지역 재생진단 모델의 탐색적 연구
장문현
한국지역지리학회지
2022
.02
[일본 농업정책의 변화_중앙정부, 우베 시, 사회적 기업 등] 지산지소운동으로 선순환 경제구조 구축 : 학교급식 지역농산물 사용 조례 및 생협방식 사회적 기업 발전
김혜인
월간 주민자치
2016
.09
신탁을 통한 재산승계와 유류분반환청구권
정소민
한양법학
2017
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-001259747