지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study proceeded in the following order: first, based on the research on liberalism or culturalism so far, it clarified the criterion of the ‘writing style of liberalism/culturalism’ as Natsume Soseki defined; second, it went through a process of making a comparative analysis of culture or cultural refinement of Soseki and anti-culture of Tanizaki Junichiro; third, it examined the significance of anti-culturalism through an analysis of Tanizaki’s CHIJINNOAI.
Taisho Liberalism or Culturalism refers to a form of personalism, i.e., a belief in the cultivation of character by means of reading literature, philosophy, and history, and is defined as the culture of the highly educated elite formed in the Taisho period. Teaching at an imperial universities, Natsume Soseki wielded great influence on young intellectuals at that time.
Soseki’s pupils, an elite group with higher education, have became the source of Taisho Liberalism.
It is no exaggeration to say that the protagonists of Soseki’s texts, who followed an elite course of top-ranking high schools and imperial universities, are the standard of cultured youths of the Taisho era.
On the other hand, Tanizaki Junichiro, who was from the same imperial universities, wrote novels that completely denied the idea of cultural refinement and hence, established the method of an antithesis to modernity that culturalism aimed at. The male intelligentsia in the works of Natsume Soseki figure as typical characters of the highly-educated elite. In contrast, none of the characters in Tanizaki Junichiro were intellectual, and so his works were given a cold reception by the literary establishment. The consistent denial of spirituality or intellectual dimension in the work of Tanizaki is an expression of fissures in the superficial modernity of Japan which was covered up with a culture of intellectuals based on the ideal of cultural refinement, and a reexamination of this can lead us to a revaluation of Japanese modernity.
Taisho Liberalism or Culturalism refers to a form of personalism, i.e., a belief in the cultivation of character by means of reading literature, philosophy, and history, and is defined as the culture of the highly educated elite formed in the Taisho period. Teaching at an imperial universities, Natsume Soseki wielded great influence on young intellectuals at that time.
Soseki’s pupils, an elite group with higher education, have became the source of Taisho Liberalism.
It is no exaggeration to say that the protagonists of Soseki’s texts, who followed an elite course of top-ranking high schools and imperial universities, are the standard of cultured youths of the Taisho era.
On the other hand, Tanizaki Junichiro, who was from the same imperial universities, wrote novels that completely denied the idea of cultural refinement and hence, established the method of an antithesis to modernity that culturalism aimed at. The male intelligentsia in the works of Natsume Soseki figure as typical characters of the highly-educated elite. In contrast, none of the characters in Tanizaki Junichiro were intellectual, and so his works were given a cold reception by the literary establishment. The consistent denial of spirituality or intellectual dimension in the work of Tanizaki is an expression of fissures in the superficial modernity of Japan which was covered up with a culture of intellectuals based on the ideal of cultural refinement, and a reexamination of this can lead us to a revaluation of Japanese modernity.
목차
Abstract
1. 들어가며
2. 소세키와 교양주의
3. 반 교양주의자 다니자키
4. 교양주의에 대한 야유
5. 나오며
참고문헌
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
다이쇼 교양주의의 고백 장치 - 남성지식인들이 있는 풍경 -
일어일문학
2019 .11
-
나쓰메 소세키 문학의 한국어 번역과수용 양상
일어일문학연구
2017 .01
-
다니자키 준이치로의 작품에 나타난 ‘아이’의 의미
일본어문학
2024 .02
-
일본 근대문학과 외부의 언어 - 다니자키 준이치로 문학의 역동성
코기토
2025 .02
-
일본근대 소설가의 희곡 창작 - 다니자키 준이치로와 미시마 유키오의 희곡 창작에 대한 비교연구를 중심으로 -
일본어문학
2019 .01
-
소세키의 『열흘 밤 꿈(夢十夜)』 고찰 —꿈의 방법에 의탁한 소세키 실존의 원풍경—
일본연구
2020 .02
-
오장환의 메타노이아(Metanoia) 연구 — 1930~40년대의 지성사 연구를 위한 예비적 고찰
인문논총
2019 .01
-
다이쇼(大正) 시대 ‘高等遊民’의 언어 활동 연구-소세키(漱石)『고코로(こころ)』의 어휘(語彙) 표현의 관점에서-
일어일문학
2022 .08
-
1910년대의 일본 신극과 레제드라마 : 다니자키 준이치로의 『탄생(誕生)』 『신제이(信西)』를 중심으로
일본연구
2015 .08
-
소세키의 어학적 어프로치와 번역-일한번역을 중심으로-
일어일문학연구
2017 .01
-
나쓰메 소세키의 생사이면에 대한 재인식 : 대환(大患) 이후를 중심으로
일어일문학
2018 .08
-
문화, 교양, 자본 그리고 자유 -초기 박인환의 이념적 모색과 시적 향방-
한민족문화연구
2018 .01
-
西洋・日本・韓国3文化圏における美のメカニズム比較分析研究
일본어문학
2018 .01
-
춘원(春園)과 나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의초･중기 작품에 나타난 지식인의 변모 양상
日本語敎育
2018 .01
-
나쓰메 소세키와 경쟁하는 인간- 이 몸은 고양이야를 중심으로 -
日本思想
2018 .01
-
多元文化背景下少数民族地区大学校园文化建设存在的问题及对策研究 ― 以延边大学为中心
중국학
2018 .01
-
메이지 후기 상류층 여성의 언어 활동에 관한 연구 - 나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의『それから』를 중심으로 -
일어일문학
2025 .02
-
夏目漱石の文學から見た恐れと罪 - 罪人の死という運命 -
일어일문학연구
2017 .01
-
서간문을 통해서 본 소세키(漱石)와 시키(子規)의 교류에 관한 고찰
일본연구
2022 .02
-
夏目漱石の｢道の為めに生きべきもの｣について ― 『野分』を中心に ―
日本語敎育
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-830-001180217