지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is an analysis of the academic activities and research on Joseon of the group of practical intellectuals who have not received attention in researches on the Joseon Marxist Academic and Cultural Movement of the 1930’s. The author tried to shed new light on them as one of the two axes of the Academic Cultural Movement along with those who forecast the ‘Scientific Joseon Studies’ while working within the range of the Nationalist Cultural Movement, and lay the foundation for an inherent view of the academic activities immediately after Korea was liberated from Japanese colonial rule in 1945.
The Proletarian Cultural Movement was a cultural maneuver led by the party and the state that emphasized the centrality of the working and farmer class immediately after Stalin took power. The Marxist intellectuals of Joseon during the Great Depression also thought hard about theoretical practice and paid a great deal of attention to this movement. The group which worked hard for cultural struggle in academics was the Marxists who graduated from Keijo Imperial University, the Social State Investigation Office and KOPF members. Their main topics were criticism of the Nationalist Cultural Movement, propagandizing the development of the Soviet Union, and the popularization of scientific theories.
They criticized that the nationalists’ researches on Joseon were engrossed in maintaining the vested rights of the old system while promoting the sanctity of the nation, and pointed out that the ‘Scientific Joseon Studies’ were lacking in the political practice will. Based on this, they pursued the ‘Practical Researches on Joseon’ that concentrated on the movement path of the working and farmer class. Furthermore, their overall research methodology was focused on an international approach emphasizing the movement of capital by the empire and the solidarity between the working class and the farmer class, and investigation of specificity for finding the origins of social problems and resolving these problems.
The Proletarian Cultural Movement was a cultural maneuver led by the party and the state that emphasized the centrality of the working and farmer class immediately after Stalin took power. The Marxist intellectuals of Joseon during the Great Depression also thought hard about theoretical practice and paid a great deal of attention to this movement. The group which worked hard for cultural struggle in academics was the Marxists who graduated from Keijo Imperial University, the Social State Investigation Office and KOPF members. Their main topics were criticism of the Nationalist Cultural Movement, propagandizing the development of the Soviet Union, and the popularization of scientific theories.
They criticized that the nationalists’ researches on Joseon were engrossed in maintaining the vested rights of the old system while promoting the sanctity of the nation, and pointed out that the ‘Scientific Joseon Studies’ were lacking in the political practice will. Based on this, they pursued the ‘Practical Researches on Joseon’ that concentrated on the movement path of the working and farmer class. Furthermore, their overall research methodology was focused on an international approach emphasizing the movement of capital by the empire and the solidarity between the working class and the farmer class, and investigation of specificity for finding the origins of social problems and resolving these problems.
#문화투쟁
#노농계급 중심성
#경성제국대학 출신 마르크스주의자
#사회실정조사소
#일본프롤레타리아문화연맹
#민족문화운동 비판
#국제적 접근
#특수성 규명
#cultural struggle
#the centrality of the working and farmer class
#Marxists who graduated from Keijo Imperial University
#Social State Investigation Office
#KOPF
#criticism of the Nationalist Cultural Movement
#international approach
#investigation of specificity
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 프롤레타리아문화운동론의 수용
Ⅲ. ‘문화투쟁’의 전개와 실행과제
Ⅳ. ‘실천적 조선연구’의 제기와 성격
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
학문의 사명에 대한 마르크스주의 지식인의 두 가지 생각 : 8·15해방 직후 학술문화운동론을 중심으로
역사연구
2021 .01
-
1920년대 開闢社의 조선지식 수집과 조선연구 토대 구축 - ‘조선문화 기본조사’의 추진과정과 내용 분석을 중심으로
역사연구
2019 .06
-
조선총독부 고적조사사업에 대한 평가와 인식 -패전 후 일본 학계의 동향을 중심으로-
한일관계사연구
2020 .05
-
문화콘텐츠와 문화콘텐츠학 개념에 대한 메타 비평 : 문화연구와 문화콘텐츠학의 비교 고찰 견지에서
인문콘텐츠
2024 .12
-
1920년대 문화사학자의 민족 자각론과 한국상고사 인식
역사와 담론
2023 .04
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
1930년대 마르크스주의 지식인의 학술문화기관 구상과 ‘科學的 朝鮮學’ 수립론
역사학연구
2016 .02
-
‘조선’ 국호로 본 여말선초의 역사인식과 이상국가론
역사와현실
2018 .06
-
안확의 ‘조선’ 연구와 문명의 발견
한국철학논집
2017 .02
-
1930년대 중후반 식민지 조선 금융기구 개편론의 전개와 함의
한국사연구
2020 .09
-
1930년 전후 조선 마르크스주의 지식인의 ‘과학론’과 ‘인텔리론’－학술문화운동 형성 배경을 중심으로－
史叢(사총)
2017 .01
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
19세기 조선의 지식인 지형 : 균열과 가능성
역사비평
2016 .11
-
1915년 조선물산공진회에 나타난 식민 권력의 이미지 구축 시도 -미술관 전시를 중심으로
탐라문화
2020 .01
-
일제의 통계 조사와 조선인의 비판적 해석
사림
2015 .01
-
조선전기 문화사 연구의 추이와 과제
역사와실학
2023 .04
-
柳宗悦の朝鮮理解の特質 ―朝鮮関連初期の著作を手がかりに―
일본문화학보
2020 .11
-
1930년대 전반기 잡지『비판』의 주도층과 편집방침
역사연구
2018 .06
-
車相瓚의 지방사정조사와 조선문화인식 : ‘朝鮮文化의 基本調査’를 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001007920