메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
蔡艺玲 (国民大學校)
저널정보
중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第103號
발행연도
2017.4
수록면
97 - 114 (18page)
DOI
10.25021/JCLL.2017.04.103.97

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to examine the relationship between ‘referential expression’ and ‘final clause’ through the ‘NP1+V1+NP2+XP’ sentence structure and analyze the phenomenon which resulted from‘binding theory’. Thus, the following characteristics will be taken into consideration.
First, this study will look at the following characteristics of the ‘referential expressions’ of the modern Chinese language.
① It will examine ‘NP2’ resulting in coreference and non-coreference with the subject of the main clause-the phenomenon of rgument structure and non-unity and the phenomenon of argument structure & unity-in the ‘NP1+V1+NP2+XP’ sentence structure.
② It will identify the characteristics of the ‘XP’ structure of the final clause resulting in tense sentence structure (CP) and verbal structure (VP) within the ‘NP1+V1+NP2+XP’ sentence structure.
Second, this study will look at the pronouns and the alternative nouns of the modern Chinese language.
① It will identify the complementary relationship between the alternative noun ‘PRO’ and the pronoun ‘pro’ in final clause.
② It will examine what the pronoun ‘pro’ of the final clause unites.
③ It will identify the relationship between the antecedent of the alternative noun of final clause-‘PRO’ and ‘自己’-and the subject of main clause within the governing category.
Third, this study will examine the binding theory characteristics from The Minimalist Program (Chomsky, 2001).
① The pronoun of final clause ‘他’ and the binding phenomenon of major subject can be explained with the binding theory but whether the theoretical conditions can do component control will be identified.
②If the subject of embedded clause is ‘自己’ with regard to the alternative noun ‘PRO’, the absence of subject cannot be a governing category. In that sense, whether it is bound with major subject by expanding into an entire sentence will be identified.
By examining the aforementioned characteristics through the structure of final clause selected by compressed verb, causative verb, and accusative verb, whether the referential expression phenomena resulting from final clause structures abide by the binding theory will be clarified.

목차

1. 서론
2. ‘NP1+V1+[NP2+XP]’중 ‘NP1’,‘NP2’의 논항관계 분석
3. ‘NP1+V1+[NP2+XP]’중 ‘NP2’의 공범주 ‘pro’와 ‘PRO’
4. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0