지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There is no specific procedure for evaluating the toxic effects on the endocrine system caused by EDCs(Endocrine Disputor Chemiclas). Although it has been discussed for a long time in the world, it still has no unified view today. EDSP(Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program) in the United States are globally pioneered and systematically evaluated as a program to evaluate and regulate EDCs, so regulators and industries around the world are closely monitoring the development and development of EDSP.
In this paper, I have discussed the perception of EDCs and their legal responses. and then the details of the EDSP led by the US EPA were introduced. In 1996, the US Congress initiated a response to the management and regulation of EDCs and passed the Food Quality Protection Act. In 1998, US EPA published an outline of the EDSP and investigated pesticides and chemicals. In 2009, 11 screening guidelines were enacted and the evaluation of pesticides and chemicals by EDSP was initiated.
The EDSTAC(Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee) report, which is EDSP advisory agency, proposes a two-step test design aimed at the potential evaluation by the screening test(Tier 1) and the adverse effect check by the test covering the living environment(Tier 2). This method requires a Tier 2 test if Tier 1 is estimated to have potential for endocrine disruptors. EDSP is a screening program aimed at the detection of chemical substances that have a toxic effect on endocrine system via MoA(Mechanism of Action) such as production, ecology, receptor binding or metabolism of in vivo hormone. From the perspective of risk communication, the US EDSP has very important implications. It is also important that EDSPs have a system for screening and testing EDCs, but it can provide important implications from the procedures EDSP has to ensure the confidence of risk information rather than.
First, almost all chemicals are screened, except when the EPA already has sufficient qualitative information.
Second, no substance is excluded or selected from screening based on existing knowledge of the potential for disturbing the endocrine system.
Third, the possibility of exposure in the selection of target substances is an important basis, because the greater the likelihood that a person or organism is exposed to the substance, the greater the risk.
Fourth, the validation of the test procedure is an important premise. In other words, only test methods with reliability in EDC evaluation are adopted. It is also an approach to ensure reliability in that it takes the WoE(weight of evidence) that is assessed on a scientific basis in determining the need for a Tier 2 test.
Fifth, the acquisition of data is carried out by the operators who actually manufacture and distribute the chemical substances according to the test order, so that the latest adverse effect information can be obtained. And By ensuring compliance with ICR(Information Collection Request) procedures under the PRA(Paperwork Reduction Act), democracy is gaining in information gathering.
In this paper, I have discussed the perception of EDCs and their legal responses. and then the details of the EDSP led by the US EPA were introduced. In 1996, the US Congress initiated a response to the management and regulation of EDCs and passed the Food Quality Protection Act. In 1998, US EPA published an outline of the EDSP and investigated pesticides and chemicals. In 2009, 11 screening guidelines were enacted and the evaluation of pesticides and chemicals by EDSP was initiated.
The EDSTAC(Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee) report, which is EDSP advisory agency, proposes a two-step test design aimed at the potential evaluation by the screening test(Tier 1) and the adverse effect check by the test covering the living environment(Tier 2). This method requires a Tier 2 test if Tier 1 is estimated to have potential for endocrine disruptors. EDSP is a screening program aimed at the detection of chemical substances that have a toxic effect on endocrine system via MoA(Mechanism of Action) such as production, ecology, receptor binding or metabolism of in vivo hormone. From the perspective of risk communication, the US EDSP has very important implications. It is also important that EDSPs have a system for screening and testing EDCs, but it can provide important implications from the procedures EDSP has to ensure the confidence of risk information rather than.
First, almost all chemicals are screened, except when the EPA already has sufficient qualitative information.
Second, no substance is excluded or selected from screening based on existing knowledge of the potential for disturbing the endocrine system.
Third, the possibility of exposure in the selection of target substances is an important basis, because the greater the likelihood that a person or organism is exposed to the substance, the greater the risk.
Fourth, the validation of the test procedure is an important premise. In other words, only test methods with reliability in EDC evaluation are adopted. It is also an approach to ensure reliability in that it takes the WoE(weight of evidence) that is assessed on a scientific basis in determining the need for a Tier 2 test.
Fifth, the acquisition of data is carried out by the operators who actually manufacture and distribute the chemical substances according to the test order, so that the latest adverse effect information can be obtained. And By ensuring compliance with ICR(Information Collection Request) procedures under the PRA(Paperwork Reduction Act), democracy is gaining in information gathering.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 내분비교란물질에 대한 인식과 법적 대응
Ⅲ. 미국환경보호청(EPA)의 내분비교란물질스크리닝프로그램(EDSP)
Ⅳ. 리스크커뮤니케이션과 EDSP로부터의 시사점
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
[학술대회논문] - 김지영 / 2017 / 사전배려원칙에 입각한 프랑스의 내분비계 장애물질의 법 정책 / 제31회 한양법학회 학술대회 자료집
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤혜선 / 2016 / 미국의 내분비계 장애물질 규제체계에 관한 연구 / 법학논총 36 (1) : 1005 ~ 1034
[학술대회논문] - J. Dix, David / 2013 / Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program Update / presentation at Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee December 5-6, 2013 Webinar Meeting
[인터넷자원] - / / https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-advisory-committees-and-regulatory- partners/pesticide-program-dialogue-committee-june-5-6
[단행본] - Colbon, T. / 1996 / Our Stolen Future / Dutton/Penguin Books
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤혜선 / 2016 / 미국의 내분비계 장애물질 규제체계에 관한 연구 / 법학논총 36 (1) : 1005 ~ 1034
[학술대회논문] - J. Dix, David / 2013 / Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program Update / presentation at Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee December 5-6, 2013 Webinar Meeting
[인터넷자원] - / / https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-advisory-committees-and-regulatory- partners/pesticide-program-dialogue-committee-june-5-6
[단행본] - Colbon, T. / 1996 / Our Stolen Future / Dutton/Penguin Books
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
내분비교란물질(환경호르몬)의 위협과 법적 대응
법조
2018 .01
-
A Study of Korean Pre-service Teachers’ Awareness, Exposure-Reducing Behaviors, and Educational Needs Regarding Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
International Journal of Early Childhood Education
2020 .01
-
미국 환경호르몬물질 관리의 정책과 법제
한양법학
2018 .05
-
인도의 내분비계 장애물질 및 화학 물질 규제현황
법과 정책연구
2018 .01
-
어린이용품에서의 내분비계 교란물질 규제에 관한 연구
법과 정책연구
2017 .01
-
내분비계 장애물질 관리 현황과 법제에 관한 연구 : 잔류성오염물질 관리법을 중심으로
법학연구
2016 .06
-
우리는 안전한 환경을 제공하고 있는가? : 환경호르몬에 대한 영유아교사의 인식과 교육적 요구에 대한 질적 연구
유아교육학논집
2023 .02
-
일본 환경호르몬물질 관리의 정책과 법제
한양법학
2018 .08
-
화학물질 관련법에 대한 입법평론
입법학연구
2018 .01
-
환경법상 리스크 관리의 소비자법적 함의
환경법연구
2015 .01
-
日本における環境上の化学物質法制度の現状と課題
환경법연구
2015 .01
-
유해화학물질로부터 안전한 서울 위한 선제적 기반 구축
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2016 .11
-
화학물질의 위험성 평가와 화관법 · 화평법의 규제적정성 검토
한양법학
2022 .11
-
사회통합과 국민안전을 위한 화학제품관리법제
유럽헌법연구
2016 .12
-
최근 미국 TSCA의 개정과 그 시사점
환경법연구
2016 .01
-
EU, 미국, 일본의 화학물질관리법 주요 쟁점 비교 연구
법과 정책연구
2017 .01
-
화학물질 관리 법제에 관한 연구 : 유해화학물질관리법과 화평법 · 화관법의 비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2016 .02
-
Public willingness to pay for endocrine disruptor eco-labeling policy in Korea
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2017 .02
-
미국의 화학물질관리에서 리스크 평가와 정당화될 수 없는 리스크 - 독성물질규제법(TSCA)을 중심으로 -
한양법학
2019 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
환경호르몬의 영향과 규제방안에 관한 연구
여민경
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2002
.12
내분비교란물질이 야생동물 및 인간의 내분비기능과 생식기능에 미치는 영향
류병호
한국식품영양과학회지
1999
.10
화학물질의 위험성 평가와 화관법 · 화평법의 규제적정성 검토
송호신
,
김현주
한양법학
2022
.11
한국의 화학무기용 특정화학물질 관리체계 개선방안 연구: 한･중･일 3 국간 비교를 중심으로
김용진
,
정주미
,
최호철
한국정책과학학회보
2022
.06
내분비계 교란물질이 신경계에 미치는 영향
신현승
,
위재호
,
이승현
외 2명
생명과학회지
2022
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0