지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The antonyms ‘가로(horizontal)’ and ‘세로(vertical)’ in present Korean, correspond to ‘□□’ and ‘셰’ in Middle Korean. The middle Korean ‘□□’ is connected to the modern and the present Korean, and it shows the transition of the language to ‘□□〉□로〉가로’. In addition, the change of ‘□□〉□르’ due to disappearance of second syllable ‘·’ in the 16th century coexist. (1) The middle Korean ‘□□’ does not an independent meaning but is used in the complex words. Each complex word corresponds to a one-syllable kanji. ‘□□티다(截)’，‘□□딜다(‘架’ and’ ‘駕’), ‘□□디르다(‘跨’). In this case, ‘□□’ should be regarded as a stem of complex word rather than an independent function used as an adverb. (2) An example corresponding to the kanji ‘橫’ appears in the 『신증유합』of the 16th century. In this case, ‘7弓" is a function as a noun or adverb in view of the nature of the meaning. (3)The use of ‘□□-’，which was used as a form of complex words and adjective stem, has been extended to the use of nouns and adverbs with independent functions in the seventeenth century. (4) In the 19th century, ‘가루’ and ‘가로’ appear. The ‘ㅗ/ㅜ’ here is a change from ‘·’. The ‘가루’ type needs to be seen as a phenomenon that was caused by the change of the second syllable ‘오〉우’.
The word ‘세로’ used in modern Korean is not found in middle Korean literature. In the same sense as ‘세로’，the word ‘셰’ appears in the 15th century『金剛經三家解』(4:31). (1) In the example of the 15th century, the kanji ‘縱’, which seems to be related to the ‘세로’ of the present Korean, is not directly connected to the ‘셰’. In the『金剛經三家解』(4:31), it serves as a noun of ‘셔다’. The ‘셰’ can be regarded as connected with the meaning of the kanji ‘立’ . ‘縱’ is interpreted as ‘아리우ᄒ’ and North and South’ respectively. (2) The monophthong ‘세’ appears in the『가례도』, and the fortis ‘쎄’ appears only in the『가례언해』. At this time, ‘세’ and ‘쎄’ have the meaning of ‘橫’, but they also have the meaning of ‘杠’ that puts it in a vertical position. (3) In the case of the function of a noun, the function as a verb is not clear. It is from the 17th century that ‘세’ used as a noun has an independent meaning function. (4) Until the nineteenth century, it was consistently used as ‘셰〉세’. In the 20th century, the word ‘세로’ is changed to ‘세루’ . If the ‘세로〉세루’ is not derived from ‘□□〉가로〉가루’, it should be set to ‘ 셰□-’, but such a relationship is not seen.
The ‘□□’ changed to ‘□□〉□르〉가르〉 가로’ according to the disappearance of ‘·’. The second syllable of ‘가로’, which appeared from the 18th century to the present, shows the change to ‘· 〉ㅗ’.
The word ‘세로’ used in modern Korean is not found in middle Korean literature. In the same sense as ‘세로’，the word ‘셰’ appears in the 15th century『金剛經三家解』(4:31). (1) In the example of the 15th century, the kanji ‘縱’, which seems to be related to the ‘세로’ of the present Korean, is not directly connected to the ‘셰’. In the『金剛經三家解』(4:31), it serves as a noun of ‘셔다’. The ‘셰’ can be regarded as connected with the meaning of the kanji ‘立’ . ‘縱’ is interpreted as ‘아리우ᄒ’ and North and South’ respectively. (2) The monophthong ‘세’ appears in the『가례도』, and the fortis ‘쎄’ appears only in the『가례언해』. At this time, ‘세’ and ‘쎄’ have the meaning of ‘橫’, but they also have the meaning of ‘杠’ that puts it in a vertical position. (3) In the case of the function of a noun, the function as a verb is not clear. It is from the 17th century that ‘세’ used as a noun has an independent meaning function. (4) Until the nineteenth century, it was consistently used as ‘셰〉세’. In the 20th century, the word ‘세로’ is changed to ‘세루’ . If the ‘세로〉세루’ is not derived from ‘□□〉가로〉가루’, it should be set to ‘ 셰□-’, but such a relationship is not seen.
The ‘□□’ changed to ‘□□〉□르〉가르〉 가로’ according to the disappearance of ‘·’. The second syllable of ‘가로’, which appeared from the 18th century to the present, shows the change to ‘· 〉ㅗ’.
목차
1. 서론
2. `□□`와-`셰`의 형태와 의미
3. `□□-` 의 기원과 형태적 특성
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 절강성 영파 천녕사탑의 당대 특징에 관한 시론
고구려발해연구
2016 .03
-
Back to Basic
번역하다
2022 .08
-
러시아어에서 조어와 파생의 개념적 경계: 이론적 논의와 언어 발달 메커니즘
언어과학연구
2025 .03
-
The derivation aspects of English and Korean fragments: non-repair strategy vs repair strategy
언어와언어학
2015 .01
-
الاشتقاق في الصرف العرب
아랍어와 아랍문학
2020 .01
-
기본소득을 어떻게 보아야 하나
철학과 현실
2021 .12
-
조선초기 언해자료에 반영된 한어변조구사법
중국언어연구
2015 .01
-
동사 접미 파생과 활용 개념의 부조화
한국어학
2015 .11
-
現代漢語致使性“得”字句的構式分類及衍生機制
중국어문학논집
2020 .06
-
기본소득제에 대한 비판적 고찰
현대사상
2022 .07
-
기초 과학과 기초 연구의 사이에서: 기초 과학 육성 정책과 기초과학연구진흥법의 등장
한국과학사학회지
2020 .01
-
상고중국어 무형파생 名源動詞 구문 주요 논항류의분류 및 분석
중국어문논총
2024 .04
-
무너진 저널리즘, 기본부터 다시
황해문화
2015 .09
-
기본권 주체, 국민을 넘어 ‘사람’으로
제3시대
2018 .03
-
접두사 ‘돌-’의 의미 고찰 -경주, 울릉도, 청도, 영덕 지역을 대상으로-
방언학
2015 .01
-
2022 개정 중국어 교육과정의 특징과 의사소통 기본 표현 개선 小考
중어중문학
2023 .09
-
수평사회를 지향하는 聖人의 ‘自’ 연구
생명연구
2019 .01
-
[교양] 기본에 충실한 책을 만들자
창비어린이
2017 .06
-
'以'의 의미 파생 및 문법화
중국언어연구
2017 .06
-
表示“撈取”義詞匯的歷史演變 - 以《齊民要術》中表“撈取”義的詞匯爲線索
중국문학연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-373-002413726