메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤소영 (건국대학교) 김혜경 (배재대학교)
저널정보
한국번역학회 번역학연구 번역학연구 제18권 제1호
발행연도
2017.3
수록면
117 - 145 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Lewis Carroll’s Alice Series comprise dual readership between adult and child. Among them, Through the Looking-Glass is a salient text for his particular language in use related to nonsense, coinage, wordplay, etc. Thus, this study aims to reveal the aspects of different cases of translated and parodied words in poems. Translating children’s literature requires more speakability and readability than adult literature for better understanding of texts. Translators adopt translation strategies including ellipsis, replacement and explanation, to narrow the gap between ST and TT with a view of equivalence. For this analysis, five Korean translations are selected to show various aspects of translations of poems in Looking-Glass and what translators put emphasis on in electing proper words. In particular, its main focus is on poems: there can be found many long poems, which are meaningful to show the path to understand this text. First of all, “Jabberworky” reveals various kinds of new nouns, which cannot be easily deciphered even in ST. For example, two-word combination words like “galumphing” and “chortle” are not easy to translate into TL. Especially when applying relevance theory to these words, Korean translators produce appropriate words for domestic readers. Also, coinages in “Jabberworky” reveal diverse translated aspects in each translation. This study shows how difficult it can be to translate figurative language and parodied words. From this perspective, TT1 seems to be a proper translation for children; TT2 for adults. In conclusion, translators’ roles are very important in mediating readership and relevance theory in translation processes.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 번역 분석
4. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-800-002383376