메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이승현 (호서대학교)
저널정보
대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제39호
발행연도
2016.10
수록면
203 - 222 (20page)
DOI
10.28977/jbtr.2016.10.39.203

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Philippians 2:6-11 has been at the center of Pauline scholarship for a long time. The passage is called the Kenosis hymn, since it praises Jesus’ emptying himself for the sake of others. While it was Ralph Martin’s view that stood out as the most popular among scholars, N. T. Wright challenged him on the basis of Hoover’s linguistic analysis of the term harpagmos. However, many scholars then published their articles, criticizing Wright in various ways. They claim that harpagmos does not necessarily mean what Jesus had already possessed before his kenosis, that the articular infinitive is not anaphoric, and that God’s form cannot be a synonym for God’s glory or nature. In this article, I will explore the key points of Wright and Hoover, and then, examine other scholars’ criticism of them. In light of their challenge against Wright and Hoover, the author will then reexamine the kenosis hymn in Philippians 2:6-11, and question their view that the equality with God was what Jesus possessed in heaven before his incarnation. The author argues that the equality with God is what God offered to Jesus at his exaltation as a compensation for his humbleness. While Jesus existed in the form of God before his incarnation, namely, in the divine status in heaven, he was not equal to God in every aspect of his status since he then and there was not called the Lord of the universe yet. According to the author’s analysis of the Kenosis hymn, the equality with God consists of the possession of God’s name the “Lord” and his cosmic lordship over those who are in heaven, on earth and under the earth. According to the overall structure of the hymn, it seems to be true that Jesus did not possess this equality with God before his incarnation. It is only after his death and resurrection that Jesus was exalted as Lord, and was bestowed the cosmic lordship. The name Lord, which was originally God’s name, and the cosmic lordship, which belonged to God only, now become status markers for the exalted Jesus. And this exaltation of Jesus became true as a result of God’s reward for his obedience and humbleness. The author knows that he does not have the last word for this complicated hymn of Philippians 2:6-11, but it is his hope that this article will help scholars move forward in their analysis of the Philippian hymn beyond what Wright and Hoover have argued.

목차

1. 들어가는 말
2. 케노시스 시에 대한 라이트의 견해와 다른 이들의 반론
3. “하나님과 동등 됨”과 빌립보서 2:6-11
4. 나가는 말
참고문헌(References)
Abstract

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-233-002232511