지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 다빈치미래교양연구소 교양학연구 교양학연구 제3집
- 발행연도
- 2016.6
- 수록면
- 45 - 71 (27page)
- DOI
- 10.24173/jge.2016.06.3.45
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study surveys the Sunflower Movement (March 18, 2014 ~ April 10, 2014), a youth movement in Taiwan, from a different post‐colonial perspective as compared to Korea.
Since the global financial crisis and new cold war in East Asia, young people have started to become more proactive as voters of representative politics and as sovereign entities. Based on the dystopian diagnosis of ‘Josun escape’ and ‘ghost island,’ the young adults of Korea and Taiwan have desired to move beyond authoritarian developmentalism since it settled in the post‐colonial era. Although both countries have experienced similar situations in terms of politics and economics, moving from the old to new empires of Japan and the United States, the countries have slightly different contexts, such as ‘pro‐Japanese.’
The reason is that in Taiwan, the Cross‐Strait Service Trade Agreement’s current criticism of ‘forgetting the homeland and flattering Japan’ is coming from the same context as that of the criticism of the young people opposed to the sudden ‘pro‐Chinese’ policies. This also relates to the opposition from the youth for writing guidelines for middle & high school textbooks which revised the textbooks by merging Taiwanese history and Chinese history, emphasizing Japanese colonial period. However, these young people were influenced by a strong Taiwanese identity which emerged in the 2000s, and subsequently, they did not agree with non‐democratic plans being pursued without public consent. Also, they are banding together with radical worldwide youth movements protesting against the regression of East Asian democracies that have been holding economic security hostage with economic excuses.
In summary, Korea needs to start thoroughly rethinking about how to move forward within the current democratic framework similar to the young Taiwanese people navigating through the East Asian post‐colonial labyrinth by recalling the old historical semantic network.
Since the global financial crisis and new cold war in East Asia, young people have started to become more proactive as voters of representative politics and as sovereign entities. Based on the dystopian diagnosis of ‘Josun escape’ and ‘ghost island,’ the young adults of Korea and Taiwan have desired to move beyond authoritarian developmentalism since it settled in the post‐colonial era. Although both countries have experienced similar situations in terms of politics and economics, moving from the old to new empires of Japan and the United States, the countries have slightly different contexts, such as ‘pro‐Japanese.’
The reason is that in Taiwan, the Cross‐Strait Service Trade Agreement’s current criticism of ‘forgetting the homeland and flattering Japan’ is coming from the same context as that of the criticism of the young people opposed to the sudden ‘pro‐Chinese’ policies. This also relates to the opposition from the youth for writing guidelines for middle & high school textbooks which revised the textbooks by merging Taiwanese history and Chinese history, emphasizing Japanese colonial period. However, these young people were influenced by a strong Taiwanese identity which emerged in the 2000s, and subsequently, they did not agree with non‐democratic plans being pursued without public consent. Also, they are banding together with radical worldwide youth movements protesting against the regression of East Asian democracies that have been holding economic security hostage with economic excuses.
In summary, Korea needs to start thoroughly rethinking about how to move forward within the current democratic framework similar to the young Taiwanese people navigating through the East Asian post‐colonial labyrinth by recalling the old historical semantic network.
목차
1. 두 명의 대만 여성, 차이잉원과 주쯔위
2. “개가 가고 돼지가 온” 후, ‘태양화’의 출현
3. “태양, 멀지 않아”, 부/재한 동아시아 민주주의
4. 결론을 대신해서
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정보화 시대의 대만 사회운동 : 2014년 해바라기 운동을 중심으로
대만연구
2016 .06
-
중화민국과 대만사이 : 하나의 역사, 복수의 역사학
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2017 .07
-
What Does Taiwan Want? It Wants to Be Taiwan
Global Asia
2021 .03
-
한·대만 관계 26주년 회고와 전망
대만연구
2018 .12
-
중국의 대 대만정책과 대만 정권교체 이후 양안관계 전망
중소연구
2016 .05
-
타이완(臺灣) 현대시의 수용과 연구현황
대만연구
2020 .12
-
대만의 전략적 중요성 : 한국의 시각
대만연구
2018 .12
-
미국의 지역적 거대전략과 ‘대만문제’의 역사적 변화
경제와사회
2022 .03
-
Same Despair but Different Hope : Youth Activism in East Asia and Contentious Politics
Journal of Asian Sociology
2018 .09
-
대만의 반도체 산업 발전과 한·대만 협력
대만연구
2022 .12
-
From Confrontation to Conflict between China and Taiwan: Major Challenges for Taiwan’s Counter Strategy
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2020 .01
-
민주화 이후 대만민족주의 변동 및 추이
대만연구
2022 .12
-
대만에서 역사교육과 국가정체성의 관계 : 청년세대의 정체성 변화를 중심으로
아시아연구
2023 .02
-
‘本土’와 ‘海洋’: 대만 ‘네이션’의 안과 밖
대만연구
2020 .12
-
Skilled Migration in Asia: Focusing on Taiwan
비교경제연구
2019 .01
-
An Imagined Brotherhood: The Rhetorical Framework and Prospects for China–Taiwan Relations
Pacific Focus
2020 .01
-
대만의 민주주의: 대중들의 정치적 인식을 통한 분석
21세기정치학회보
2023 .09
-
중국의 태평양도서국 정책: 타이완의 국제적 고립화 전략을 중심으로
Journal of North Korea Studies
2019 .01
-
대만 경제 `중국 의존` 현상의 경제적 요인 및 함의
중소연구
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-005-002068995