메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한동욱 (전북대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제25권 제6호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
451 - 460 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The paper addresses the effect of faked feedback from either a good trial or a poor trial on the change of learning in temporal timing. Specifically, four groups which consisted of 12 participants per one group participated in pre-exercise phase, acquisition phase, retention test, and two transfer tests for this study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups, which consisted of a group taking a good feedback on a good trial (g-g group), a group taking a poor feedback on a poor trial (p-p group), a group taking a poor feedback on a good trial (p-g group), and a group taking a good feedback on a poor trial (g-p group). The task is to press two computer keys in coinciding with the temporal timing on five segments with five different lengths. The feedback provided information concerning either a good or a poor KR on each a good or a poor trial after three trials. The results were as follows. Firstly, in pre-exercise phase the analysis showed no significant differences on the relative timing error and the absolute timing error among four groups, and this result indicated that participants had similar timing ability before acquisition phase. Secondly, in the acquisition phase the relative timing error and the absolute timing error had a tendency to decrease as the practice progressed. Thirdly, in the retention test and two transfer tests g-g group and g-p group except for g-p group in transfer 1 test resulted in better relative timing than p-p group. However, the absolute timing error was not different across the groups in the retention, and 2 transfe-tests. Those results suggest that feedback types can produce a difference in the relative timing learning.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-692-002028043