지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article concerns whether two different numbers of points on a Likert scale task produces different results in acceptability judgment testing. The most popular numbers of points on response scales are 5 and 7, and there seems to be no clear consensus about which of the two is better and why. As the same goes for experimental syntax studies, the choice of the numbers of points on the scales still remains questionable, though the Likert scale task has been widely employed in acceptability judgment testing. The present study compares two experimental data sets using the same stimuli sentences but with different point scales (5 and 7). It includes 46,356 data points and 506 Korean native speakers participated in the study. The comparison between the 5- and 7-point scale data is made in terms of (a) variance of data points, (b) convergence between the linguists’ judgments and the participants’ judgments, and (c) response time. The comparative analysis reveals that the two different point scales do not yield significantly different results. Yet, it is also observed that there exist pros and cons to both sides. The 7-point scale is more demanding than the 5-point scale to the extent that the middle point is rather scarcely used. On the other hand, the 5-point scale is sloppier than the 7-point scale to the extent that the latter captures the variation in acceptability judgments across the participants slightly better.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Basic Discussion
3. Literature Review
4. Previous Experiment: 5-point
5. Current Experiment: 7-point
6. Comparative Analysis
7. Our Findings
8. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Alwin, D. F. / 1997 / Feeling Thermometers Versus 7-Point Scales Which are Better? / Sociological Methods & Research 25 (3) : 318 ~ 340
[단행본] - Chomsky, N. / 1968 / Language and Mind / Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Cohen, J. / 1960 / A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales / Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1) : 37 ~ 46
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Colman, A. M. / 1997 / Comparing Rating Scales of Different Lengths: Equivalence of Scores from 5-point and 7-point Scales / Psychological Reports 80 (2) : 355 ~ 362
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Cox, E. P. III / 1980 / The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review / Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4) : 407 ~ 422
[단행본] - Chomsky, N. / 1968 / Language and Mind / Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Cohen, J. / 1960 / A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales / Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1) : 37 ~ 46
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Colman, A. M. / 1997 / Comparing Rating Scales of Different Lengths: Equivalence of Scores from 5-point and 7-point Scales / Psychological Reports 80 (2) : 355 ~ 362
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Cox, E. P. III / 1980 / The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review / Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4) : 407 ~ 422
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Different Ways to Test Acceptability Judgments
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Within/Between or Latin Square: Experimental Designs of Acceptability Judgment Testing
언어과학
2022 .02
-
한국어 수용성 판단에서의 형식적 방법과 비형식적 방법의 비교(2)
언어학 연구
2019 .04
-
In Defense of Comparisons between Formal and Informal Acceptability Judgments
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
Acceptability Judgments of Double Case-Marking Constructions in Korean
언어와 정보
2017 .07
-
한국어 수용성판단 자료의 학술지간 비교: ‘생성문법연구’와 ‘국어학’을 중심으로
생성문법연구
2021 .05
-
한국어 수용성판단에서의 학술지간 신뢰도 분석
한말연구
2021 .01
-
Korean Wh-Island Sentences: Individual Differences in Acceptability Judgments and Working Memory
어학연구
2019 .08
-
한국어 수용성 판단에서의 형식적 방법과 비형식적 방법의 비교- 이산형 측정 자료의 경우
한말연구
2019 .01
-
실험통사론의 형식적 연구방법에 대한 고찰: 영어 수용성 판단 중심으로
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
한국어 수용성 판단의 실험방법론 비교 연구
언어과학연구
2015 .03
-
Measuring the Degree of Convergence between Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments for Korean
언어
2017 .12
-
헤겔의 현존재의 판단론 비판
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
피험자의 배경 변인이 수용성 판단에 영향을 끼치는가?
언어와언어학
2017 .01
-
What do you mean by contrast in syntax?
언어연구
2017 .01
-
Effect of Processibility on EFL Learners’ Acceptability Judgments of Wh-Island Constructions
응용언어학
2017 .12
-
맹자 윤리학에 기초한 도덕 판단 모델 연구
윤리연구
2020 .01
-
Korean -lato and the pragmatic scale
언어과학연구
2023 .06
-
이중주어 구문의 높임 호응에 대한 의미론적 재조명: 수용도 판정 실험을 통한 실증 연구
언어
2023 .12
-
칸트의 무한판단론 고찰
동서철학연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-701-001646841