지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.9
- 수록면
- 3 - 24 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
South Korean criminal justice system has established the exclusionary rule since 2007. A number of convictions have been quashed on the basis of this rule. Such circumstances lead to a change in practice, in particular, criminal investigation.
One significant example of the exclusionary rule is a judgment that excluded evidence, blood alcohol content, which was obtained without consent or a warrant even though the suspect was under unconsciousness. Under these circumstances, criminal investigators are wondering how they can obtain legally appropriate evidence and what criminal procedure their operations are based on. 79) This study, firstly, has explored the compulsory sampling of blood. Then, based on a judgment by the Supreme Court, I have examined whether a post-warrant can be an alternative. To analyse current situations in South Korea, a comparative research method has been mainly employed. Japanese system of criminal justice can be a significant comparator because it has a similar system.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001375686