지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.3
- 수록면
- 31 - 59 (29page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study illuminates the dialectic development of due process and crime control functions in search and seizure of the United States, mostly by focusing on exclusionary and bright-line rules which have been established by the U. S. Supreme Court since 1960s.
It would be redundant to say that search and seizure in crime investigation is essential for effectively acquiring evidence and securing defendants for trial. Search and seizure, however, seriously violates individual's privacy, liberty, and property. For this reason several jurisdictions around the world, especially the United States, have developed mandatory exclusionary rules to exclude evidence obtained unlawfully or unreasonably. In 2007, Korea newly inserted Article 308-2, the exclusionary rule that is similar to the United States, into the Korean Criminal Procedure Act. With no precedent exclusionary principles, however, it is expected that confusion is inevitable, for the time being, for Korean courts as they provide investigative authorities with specific guidelines on when and how much evidence acquired outside of due process must be excluded.
This paper: 1) explains how the exclusionary and bright-line rules have formed the search and seizure system of the United States, and, 2) recommends that those two rules be used as the foundation for the Korean exclusionary rule. Part II provides two comparative perspectives of this study. Part Ⅲ specifically explains how the U. S. Supreme Court has neutralized the strong effect of exclusionary rules by, in part, tightly interpreting the reasonable expectancy of privacy but broadening the definition of probable cause, which are pre-conditions of lawful search and seizure. Part Ⅳ argues that the U. S. Supreme Court utilized the theory of a bright-line rule to reduce the exclusionary rule making search and seizure principles of the United States much more crime-control oriented. Part V. concludes that these two rules should be studied in greater depth for the Korean exclusionary rules to be well balanced.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001374821