메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
경찰대학 경찰학연구편집위원회 경찰학연구 경찰학연구 제8권 제3호(통권 제18호)
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
59 - 85 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There is a system called “yeongchang” in the Koeran auxiliary police. “yeongchang” is a disciplinary punishment specified in the law that a commanding officer can confine an auxiliary policeman who conducted a minor offense in the police cell. It is a disciplinary punishment in a form but like a detention as a penalty. This system has a substantial problem. it doesn’t need the warrant of th judge that should be required in the criminal procedure. Nowadays the people who insist that the similar system exists in U. S. and Germany Army. But that assertion is not correct. there is not the same system in U. S. Army that corresponds to “yeongchang”. In Germany there is “Disziplinararrest” similar to “yeongchang”. But a commanding officer should receive the consent of the judge before imposing the punishment. In conclusion the system should be abolished but as the alternative is as follows. First, it needed to be judged the legality of the punishment by the chief of a police station and should be guaranteed by the principle of “due procoss of law” in the process of disciplinary punishment. Second, if there is a request about the disciplinary action, the execution of “yeongchang” should be stayed without delay. Third, it is necessary to inducing ‘the suspension of disciplinary confinement’.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001374245