메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정흔 (충남대학교) 신의수 (충남대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제25권 제4호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2016.8
수록면
1,515 - 1,527 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematic analysis of the factors crouching start movement subject at university excellent female sprinters and non-excellent female sprinters. And this study was conducted from September 2015 to January 2016. This experiment is results were as follows from the comparative analysis of the kinematic factors. First, the duration of each phase was not significantly different. However, shorter average duration of excellent sprinter. Second, CM horizontal displacement showed a significant difference in event 2 and event 3. And, the excellent sprinter were long of CM position. CM vertical displacement showed a significant difference between the event 1. And the excellent sprinter were high of CM position. Third, CM horizontal velocity showed a significant difference between event 2, event 3 and event 4. And CM horizontal velocity of excellent sprinter showed faster. CM vertical velocity rate was significant difference in event 3. And non-excellent sprinter it was faster downward move. Fourth, trunk tilt angle showed a significant difference in event 1. And excellent sprinter seemed a little trunk tilt angle. Fifth, the hip joints and knee joints were no statistically significant differences. But right ankle joint angle showed a significant difference in all event. And excellent sprinter seemed a smaller angle. Left ankle angle showed a significant difference in event 1, event 2 and event 4. And excellent sprinter seemed a smaller angle. Sixth, angle of t runk torsion ROM (range of motion) is an excellent female sprinters were larger than non-excellent female sprinters. And showed a significant difference in P1.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-692-001129703