메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Problems in Pay TV Market Policy and Direction for Improvement
Recommendations
Search
Questions

유료방송시장 정책의 문제점과 개선방향

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Sung Oak Yun (경기대)
Journal
Korean society for media Law, Ethics and Policy research Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research Vol.15 No.1 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2016.4
Pages
1 - 33 (33page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Problems in Pay TV Market Policy and Direction for Improvement
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This paper covers regulatory policies concerning the Pay-TV market in the changing new media environment. Many issues regarding Pay-TV policies were raised particularly from SKT’s acquisition of CJ Hellovision (CJHV) in 2015. As there were conflicting interests, various interpretations were made. Rather than approaching and handling SKT’s acquisition of CJHV as a single issue, Pay-TV policy directions and principles in the context of local media law must be established first. Accordingly, this paper reviewed regulations on ownership and cross-ownership, regional characteristics, and channel policies in Korea’s Broadcasting Act and Amendment to Broadcasting Act (submitted to National Assembly on 26 November 2015). The resulting advisable regulatory policy directions and policy suggestions for the local Pay-TV market are as follows. First, Pay-TV service providers need to be regulated as a single market. Second, the principle of regulatory consistency needs to be applied. Third, regulations on ownership needs to be modified or eased. Fourth, regulations on cross-ownership between Cable SO, Satellite broadcasting, and IPTV need to be organized in a consistent manner. Fifth, regional policies for Pay-TV need to be re-established. Sixth, Pay TV providers’ direct operating channels need to be fully permitted.

Contents

〈국문초록〉
1. 문제제기
2. 이론적 논의
3. 현행 법제와 쟁점별 문제점
4. 통합방송법안 쟁점과 문제점 검토
5. 정책적 제언
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

References (30)

Add References

Related precedents (2)

1 / 1
  • 헌법재판소 2015. 4. 30. 선고 2012헌바358 결정

    1.△△방송과 지역△△방송에 대해 방송법 제8조 제8항 본문이 규정하고 있는 지분 또는 주식소유의 제한원칙을 그대로 적용한다면, △△방송은 기존에 보유하고 있던 지역△△방송 주식의 상당량을 처분해야 하는데, 이 경우 △△방송의 지휘아래 유기적이고 통합적으로 운영되던 지역△△방송에 대한 관리, 감독이 어려워지게 되고, 결국 지역△△방송은 시장동향에 민감한 민

    View more
  • 헌법재판소 2006. 6. 29. 선고 2005헌마165,314,555,807,2006헌가3(병합) 전원재판부

    가. 적법요건에 대한 판단

    View more

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-070-001017933