지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article tried to explain the importance of maritime trade in the medieval southern China, Six Dynasties(六朝). Even though ‘the sea silk road’ opened in Han dynasty, the Indian Ocean and the South China sea trade was increased rapidly in the Six Dynasties period. The main reason of such growth was the development of ocean sailing technology. Ships were equipped with several sails and the sailors understood the effect of trade wind. Such technology made chinese merchant sail to the Indian Ocean much faster than Han sailors. And Han sailors used to sail along the coast, but the merchants of Six Dynasties made a voyage on the ocean. The port of Guang-Zhou became a starting point of a long ocean cruise.
The growth of maritime trade stimulated the inner commercial trade of Southern Empires (南朝). Lingnan(嶺南), the center of maritime trade and Jiankang(建康), the capital of the dynasty, both became the two axis of inner commercial network. The energy of Jiankang’s market system partly depended upon the Lingnan’s maritime trade. It also stimulated the appearance of village market(草市), which was prohibited in Han times, it showed that the common village farmers were used to buy and sell in near small market. And Persian silver coin which was imported by maritime traders, was circulated in the Lingnan region. It strongly proved that the ocean trade was the matter to develop the inner commercial trade of Six Dynasties.
Even though there was no official institution of state running system for maritime trade, which was appeared at Tang dynasty, the benefit of trade was integrated into the dynasty finance by several ways. Lingnan provincial governors tributed their imported goods to Jiankang. And the main part of dynastic financial income was not came from the collection of grain or silk, but came from commercial tax which was collected by currency. Such tax came from the commercial benefit, which was partly depended on the maritime trade. And there was a unique custom of ‘huanzi(還資)’, that was the tribute of a provincial governor who finished his terms. That custom was another way to collect the maritime imports, it also supported the dynasty finance. Like this, the maritime trade was essential part to maintain the Six Dynasties finance. It proved the importance of a maritime trade of Six dynasties.
The growth of maritime trade stimulated the inner commercial trade of Southern Empires (南朝). Lingnan(嶺南), the center of maritime trade and Jiankang(建康), the capital of the dynasty, both became the two axis of inner commercial network. The energy of Jiankang’s market system partly depended upon the Lingnan’s maritime trade. It also stimulated the appearance of village market(草市), which was prohibited in Han times, it showed that the common village farmers were used to buy and sell in near small market. And Persian silver coin which was imported by maritime traders, was circulated in the Lingnan region. It strongly proved that the ocean trade was the matter to develop the inner commercial trade of Six Dynasties.
Even though there was no official institution of state running system for maritime trade, which was appeared at Tang dynasty, the benefit of trade was integrated into the dynasty finance by several ways. Lingnan provincial governors tributed their imported goods to Jiankang. And the main part of dynastic financial income was not came from the collection of grain or silk, but came from commercial tax which was collected by currency. Such tax came from the commercial benefit, which was partly depended on the maritime trade. And there was a unique custom of ‘huanzi(還資)’, that was the tribute of a provincial governor who finished his terms. That custom was another way to collect the maritime imports, it also supported the dynasty finance. Like this, the maritime trade was essential part to maintain the Six Dynasties finance. It proved the importance of a maritime trade of Six dynasties.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 해상 교역의 증가와 신항로의 등장
Ⅲ. 시장의 확대와 嶺南의 화폐 유통
Ⅳ. 국가 재정에 미친 영향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (60)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중소기업금융으로서 무역금융제도의 개선방안
무역상무연구
2017 .08
-
The US-China Trade War: Some Implications for Russian Foreign Trade and Trade Policy
월간 KIET 산업경제
2020 .04
-
미·중 무역 변동성 결정요인 분석 - 교역 다양성을 중심으로 -
중국과 중국학
2022 .01
-
품목별 교역량에 영향을 미치는 거시경제 변동성 요인 분석 - 한국의 주요 교역 품목을 중심으로
한국경제학보
2019 .01
-
디지털 교역과 통상규범 : 상품·서비스 교역 ‘일체화’의 통상협정에 대한 함의
국제경제법연구
2018 .07
-
주요국 경제안보 강화에 따른 해상 공급망 재편의 세계 교역 효과 분석 : 정기선 해운 연결성 지수 원시자료를 중심으로
해운물류연구
2024 .09
-
국제교역환경변화에 따른 해상교역패턴 변화 분석: 우리나라 주요 컨테이너 항만을 중심으로
해운물류연구
2016 .01
-
한국의 산업별 교역조건 결정요인 분석 및 시사점
연구보고서
2016 .12
-
A Study on the Characteristics of Intra-Industry Trade for Korea’s E-Commerce Trade
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2020 .03
-
한국의 EU 및 주요 교역국에 대한 경제통합 효과 추정
유럽연구
2015 .09
-
Estimating the Economic Impact of Digital Trade Agreement
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2024 .07
-
Some Policy Issues of the SOEs in Government Finance System in Korea
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2018 .10
-
The Impact of Trade Liberalization in Africa
[KIEP] Working Paper
2017 .11
-
Promoting Trade Diplomacy through Digital Trade
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .07
-
Determinants of the Trade Volume between Korea and China's 31 Provincial Governments
전자무역연구
2016 .01
-
Trade, Trade Finance, and Global Liquidity in Asia; Markov-Switching FAVAR Approach
[KIEP] East Asian Economic Review
2016 .09
-
国IT産業の日本に対する質的貿易競争力の研究
일본근대학연구
2019 .01
-
中国的产融规制：现状、问题与完善
금융법연구
2021 .12
-
우리나라 주요 산업부문 기술무역의 R&D투자 및 FDI효과 분석
유통경영학회지
2019 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-910-002763831