메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제32집
발행연도
2005.3
수록면
109 - 134 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this article I investigate the polysemy of the preposition in. First I provide the study of prepositions by Lindner(1983) as a theoretical background for this article. The problem of the Lindner`s approach is that she uses the concept of movement in presenting image schema for prepositions in and out. The concept of movement involves the relation which evolves over time, so the concept is typically the basic attribute of verbs. On the other hand, prepositions are atemporal. Prepositions refers to the asymmetrical relation of the trajector and the landmark, but not to the movement of the trajector. In this article, I present the image schema of preposition in not using the concept of movement and investigate the relation of the meanings associated with in. And I demonstrate that the meanings associated with in should be approached in terms of polysemy approach, but not in terms of approaches of homonymy and monosemy. There are five semantic clusters in the semantic network of in the location cluster, the interior vantage-point cluster, the exterior vantage-point cluster, the segmentation cluster, reflexivity. From the location cluster arise a range of closely related meanings of In Situ Sense, State Sense, Activity Sense, Means Sense. The interior vantage- point cluster gives rise to many distinct meanings of Perceptual Accessibility Sense, In Favour Sense, Arrival Sense. The exterior vantage-point cluster gives rise to the meaning of the Disappearance Sense. The segmentation cluster gives rise to the meanings of The Shape As Boundary Sense and Blockage Sense. And reflexivity gives rise to Reflexive Sense. Finally, I study the contrast of in and into. English preposition in is not related to orientation but to the bounded landmark, while preposition into is related to orientation. Later I will study the relatedness of in and out which are in the same category of prepositions which use the concept of boundedness.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002561006