지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to observe the cultural significance of Georgia as the place of realization of avant-garde during 1917-1921 under the complex situation of Transcaucasia after the Revolution and to shed light on the introduction of modernism in the capital of Georgia, Tbilisi, as well as, the development and evolvement conditions of Russian Futurism.
Due to the Revolution, the creation of Russian Futurism and the fate of futurists took a new turn. The Russian Futurists during the Revolution scattered among the outer cities free from Bolshevik influence and continued their futurist activities and prepared a new base for creation. Georgia, which was characterized for its unique cultural openness stemming from anti-revolutionary characteristics centered on Mensheviks and Western orientation, became a refuge and shelter from the war for Russian Futurists who were under the repression of Bolshevik regime. The country served as the base of free creative expression of their new lives. After the visit from A. Kruchenykh in 1916, futurism becomes fully active in Georgia. The first futurist group in Georgia, the “Futurists’ Syndicate” was created in 1917. Also, with the joining of Georgian poet and artist, the Zdanevich brothers, the aesthetic orientation becomes even more refined. The group focuses on lectures and publication with the poets native to Georgia and keeps alive “zaum poetry” of futurism stemming from two types of aesthetic orientations called Western cubism and primitivism. On top of such cultural foundation, I. Terentiev joins the group and creates the second and final group “41°,” which marks the peak of futurist activity. Although the futurist activities in Georgia that continued since the Revolution had declined after the establishment of the Soviet regime, it was not the end of futurism. This is because not only was 41° introduced to the French avant-garde in 1920, but also provided an aesthetical foundation for the Russian avant-garde group “OBERIU” in 1920-1930.
Due to the Revolution, the creation of Russian Futurism and the fate of futurists took a new turn. The Russian Futurists during the Revolution scattered among the outer cities free from Bolshevik influence and continued their futurist activities and prepared a new base for creation. Georgia, which was characterized for its unique cultural openness stemming from anti-revolutionary characteristics centered on Mensheviks and Western orientation, became a refuge and shelter from the war for Russian Futurists who were under the repression of Bolshevik regime. The country served as the base of free creative expression of their new lives. After the visit from A. Kruchenykh in 1916, futurism becomes fully active in Georgia. The first futurist group in Georgia, the “Futurists’ Syndicate” was created in 1917. Also, with the joining of Georgian poet and artist, the Zdanevich brothers, the aesthetic orientation becomes even more refined. The group focuses on lectures and publication with the poets native to Georgia and keeps alive “zaum poetry” of futurism stemming from two types of aesthetic orientations called Western cubism and primitivism. On top of such cultural foundation, I. Terentiev joins the group and creates the second and final group “41°,” which marks the peak of futurist activity. Although the futurist activities in Georgia that continued since the Revolution had declined after the establishment of the Soviet regime, it was not the end of futurism. This is because not only was 41° introduced to the French avant-garde in 1920, but also provided an aesthetical foundation for the Russian avant-garde group “OBERIU” in 1920-1930.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 혁명기 조지아의 정치, 문화적 상황
3. 조지아 내 러시아 미래주의의 유입과 발전
4. 나가며
《참고문헌》
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
책으로서의 세계 - 러시아 아방가르드의 시각적 실험과 범기호주의
유럽사회문화
2017 .12
-
Nationalism in Eurasia: Ethnic Purification and Interethnic Conflict in Georgia
인문사회과학연구
2022 .02
-
2012년 이후 조지아의 대러 정책 변화 - 양상과 요인 -
슬라브硏究
2021 .01
-
러시아아방가르드 예술의 발생과 기원 : 초기 예술 그룹의 자유와 직관의 정신에 대하여
스토리앤이미지텔링
2018 .12
-
[러시아] 회고와 전망: 2015~2016년 러시아사 : ‘더 많이 다양하게 쓰기’의 재현
역사학보
2017 .09
-
Imperial Biopolitics and Its Disavowals: Russia, Georgia, and Spaces In-Between
REGION
2018 .01
-
공익광고를 통해서 본 현대 러시아 사회- 2000년대 이후 주요 이슈와 변화 양상 -
외국학연구
2022 .06
-
세계사 속의 러시아혁명
한중관계연구
2018 .01
-
현대 러시아의 대중의식을 통해 살펴본 ‘10월 혁명’ : 소연방 해체 이후 현재까지 여론 조사를 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2018 .01
-
A STUDY ON THE PROCESS OF SYSTEM TRANSITION IN GEORGIA
장신논단
2021 .11
-
민족과 혁명: 1920년대 초 사회주의 수용에서 러시아혁명 인식의 문제
민족문학사연구
2021 .12
-
혁명기 예술의 과제 : 1920년대 초반 러시아아방가르드의 사례를 중심으로
시대와 철학
2015 .12
-
문학사 기술과 이념성 : 한국적 맥락에서 읽는 신간 옥스퍼드 러시아문학사
슬라브학보
2019 .03
-
마야콥스키와 러시아 미래주의: 혁명의 예술, 예술의 혁명
러시아어문학연구논집
2017 .08
-
러시아 문화연구 30년 : 연구와 번역으로 본 외연의 확장, 접점에서의 기대
노어노문학
2016 .03
-
러시아 역사 속 러시아정교 이해하기 - 기독교 선교를 위한 접근과 함의
복음과 선교
2020 .01
-
잡지 『신생활』의 문화 정치와 러시아혁명사
민족문화연구
2023 .02
-
러시아 혁명과 중국공산당의 자기개조의 길 :反볼셰비키화를 넘어서
한중관계연구
2018 .01
-
현대 러시아 영화산업 현황과 글로컬리티 지향성
노어노문학
2020 .12
-
러시아의 근외정책과 정치 지도자 선택 : 조지아와 우크라이나 비교 연구
러시아어문학연구논집
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-309-002308446