지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is basically how the Goryeo government greeted foreign emissaries, and the objective of such examination is to determine what kind of status Goryeo had in the international community at the time. In the Goryeo period’s early half, whenever a Khitan emissary visited Goryeo and delivered the Khitan emperor’s edict to the Goryeo king, the emissary would face South and the king would face ‘West,’ at least according to records. Such odd standoff, in which one was facing south while one was facing west, showing ‘not exactly opposite’ directions, was derived from an interesting situation in which both countries had different ideas to associate with specific directions. Simply speaking, Goryeo and Khitan both interpreted the rules in a way that would empower their own respective positions, and the result was the aforementioned position of both parties. In the Goryeo king’s greeting of Sung and Chin emissaries, similar rules (employment of the rules, at least) applied.
Entering the Yuan period, the Goryeo king had to observe rules which were observed by the ‘Chinese local’ officials when they received orders from their own(Yuan) central government. In other words, Goryeo, although being a foreign country with a realm which was separate from China, was considered as part of the Yuan order, and was required to observe the Empire’s ‘domestic’ rules. Such situation continued for a rather long time, and also due to the Jeongdong Haengseong provincial government that was installed on the Korean peninsula, Goryeo’s position as an extension of the Yuan territory and part of its realm became semi-permanent, at least in terms of envoy-greeting protocols.
Later, Ming dynasty recognized Goryeo as a foreign country, but for the first time as a Chinese dynasty it dictated rules that should be observed by a foreign country’s court whenever a Ming emissary would visit it. The contents of the protocols, interestingly enough, were the same with those that were observed in ‘Ming local’ regions (when local officials received orders from the central). In other words, it was a recurrence of a certain practice that had been imposed upon Goryeo earlier by the Yuan empire. Goryeo, which came to accept its status as a vassal state after a century-long relationship with the Yuan empire, also accepted Ming’s demands and observed protocols accordingly.
Entering the Yuan period, the Goryeo king had to observe rules which were observed by the ‘Chinese local’ officials when they received orders from their own(Yuan) central government. In other words, Goryeo, although being a foreign country with a realm which was separate from China, was considered as part of the Yuan order, and was required to observe the Empire’s ‘domestic’ rules. Such situation continued for a rather long time, and also due to the Jeongdong Haengseong provincial government that was installed on the Korean peninsula, Goryeo’s position as an extension of the Yuan territory and part of its realm became semi-permanent, at least in terms of envoy-greeting protocols.
Later, Ming dynasty recognized Goryeo as a foreign country, but for the first time as a Chinese dynasty it dictated rules that should be observed by a foreign country’s court whenever a Ming emissary would visit it. The contents of the protocols, interestingly enough, were the same with those that were observed in ‘Ming local’ regions (when local officials received orders from the central). In other words, it was a recurrence of a certain practice that had been imposed upon Goryeo earlier by the Yuan empire. Goryeo, which came to accept its status as a vassal state after a century-long relationship with the Yuan empire, also accepted Ming’s demands and observed protocols accordingly.
목차
머리말
1. 고려 전기, 예제 해석의 이중성
2. 원 국내 지방 의례와의 동일화
3. 명의 사신 파견 의례 제정과 고려의 수용
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (41)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국인과 한국어 학습자의 인사 화행 연구
이중언어학
2015 .01
-
거란의 ‘고려사신의례(高麗使臣儀禮)’ 구성과 의미 : 『요사(遼史)』예지(禮志) 분석을 중심으로
역사와현실
2015 .12
-
사회적 변인에 따른 한국인과 미얀마인의 인사 실현 연구
한국중국어교육학회 학술대회
2022 .03
-
퇴임 인사 표현의 사회언어학적 연구
한말연구
2020 .01
-
『논어』 및 그 해석사는 정합성을 갖는가? - 관중에 대한 공자의 평을 중심으로 -
동양철학
2024 .07
-
한국인의 퇴임에 대한 인식 및 퇴임 인사 표현 연구
사회언어학
2021 .09
-
한국 개신교와 불교 홈페이지의 인사말 비교 연구
언어과학연구
2019 .06
-
한국어 인사 표현의 유형 분류 고찰
어문논총
2025 .02
-
Silence and greeting as avoidance strategies: A cross-cultural comparison
언어와언어학
2015 .01
-
『좌전』에 나타난 ‘예론 禮論’ 연구
중국어문학논집
2015 .08
-
한국어 모어 화자와 베트남인 한국어 학습자의 인사 화행 연구
우리말글
2023 .06
-
「손 the guest」에 나타난 악의 재현 방식과 그 의미
어문론집
2019 .12
-
공자의 ‘道’에 관한 고찰
양명학
2021 .12
-
『源氏物語』における「命」の表現性
일어일문학연구
2015 .02
-
저항적 주체 형성의 동인으로서 인(仁) - 공동체의 회복을 위한 동양 철학적 시도 -
철학연구
2022 .08
-
Guest Editor’s Introduction
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2016 .12
-
Guest Editor’s Introduction
Journal of Korean Religions
2015 .04
-
Guest Editor's Introduction
Journal of Korean Religions
2020 .01
-
Guest Editors’ Introduction
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0