메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최순육 (서울신학대학교)
저널정보
중앙대학교 일본연구소 일본연구 일본연구 제34집
발행연도
2013.2
수록면
239 - 260 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this thesis is to compare and re-interpret Shimazaki Toson"s Ode on a White Urn with Keats" Ode on a Grecian Urn which has still been mystified by most of critics and readers who have mainly been pinned down to the mythic parts of the poem.
As a concrete research measure, at first, it was to pursue the trace of Keats" Ode on a Grecian Urn. secondly to pursue the trace of presentness in parallel expressed on Toson"s.
As the method of criticism, the Text-criticism is to deal with Keats" Ode on a Grecian Urn, comparing with Toson"s.
Toson read mostly the english romantics : Shelley, Byron, Keats, Coleridge, and Wordsworth.
For the first stanza, Harold Bloom tells us the mythic level centering on the patterns of the “Urn.” Here “Urn” is an art in itself visible to us. We finds the poet’s fate of being forced to keep on singing regardless of his contemporaries’ concerns and tastes, which shows Keats and Toson"s agony losing universality and popularity for his works.
In conclusion, Keats and Toson foregrounds the “Urn” and backgrounds significance of art and simultaneously sets mythic historicity and contemporary presentness in parallel.
This is concerned with the oracular message to blind readers over centuries : “Beauty is truth, truth beauty, - that is all. / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.”

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 『백자화병 부(白磁花甁賦)』의 국제적 구성
3. 『백자화병 부』와 키츠의 『희랍항아리 부』
4. 나오며
参考文献
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-001999589