메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Dynamics of Capital Accumulation and Distribution : A Critique and Alternative to Kaleckian Empirical Approaches
Recommendations
Search
Questions

자본축적과 분배의 동학 : 칼레츠키언 실증연구의 비판적 검토와 대안

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jeong Sangjun (목포대학교)
Journal
Institute for Social Sciences, Gyeongsang National University MARXISM Vol.12 No.4 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2015.11
Pages
150 - 181 (32page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Dynamics of Capital Accumulation and Distribution : A Critique and Alternative to Kaleckian Empirical Approaches
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
A seminal paper by Bhaduri and Marglin (1990) provided a unifying model that allows for the contrary effects of distribution on economic growth, and it motivated a huge body of empirical literature on wage-and profit-led growth. However, these (neo) Kaleckian approaches obtain different results for the same economy, depending on time ranges and methodologies. Instead, through rereading the Bhaduri-Marglin model, we note not only the conventional distinction between wage-and profit-led regimes but the one between conflictual and cooperative regimes still matters. Besides, we highlight that the time horizon and non-linearity are another important issues in the original model, though overlooked by empirical studies. Based on this critique, a decomposing of the trend and cyclical components of the core variables such as the accumulation rate, wage share and capacity utilization rate is proposed as an alternative. With a case analysis of the U.S. economy from 1961 to 2014, we find that the roughly cooperative wage-led trend and conflictual profit-led cycle are combined in the dynamics of capital accumulation and distribution over the period, and that the trend can switch over to that of a conflictual regime with the cumulative effect of cycles. This point gets additional support through an econometric estimation using ARDL-bounds testing. Our findings can explain previous conflicting results and reveal the commonalities and differences between the Kaleckian and Marxian approaches.

Contents

1. 머리말
2. 바두리·마글린 모형의 재독해
3. 대안적 접근의 방향
4. 미국경제의 실증분석
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-301-002185663