메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박기철 (고려대학교) 주재우 (경희대학교)
저널정보
국방대학교 국가안전보장문제연구소 The Korean Journal of Security Affairs The Korean Journal of Security Affairs 제27권 제1호
발행연도
2022.6
수록면
26 - 49 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
What factors determine the success of, and failure thereof, Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) respectively? What are the factors and conditions that enhance the effectiveness of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) nonproliferation regimes? Does correlation exist between the effectiveness of regimes and the great power' support for said regimes? If so, under what circumstances or determinants does the great power support or reject regimes? This study is to identify the determinants of the success and failure of nonproliferation regime of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) under the U.N. system. The international efforts to ensure the life and safety of mankind from WMD have led to create 19 WMD nonproliferation regime starting with the Geneva Protocol in 1925. Among 19 WMD nonproliferation regimes, only 4 regimes (CWC, INF, NPT, IAEA) have strong implementation power and are evaluated as successful regimes, while 5 regimes (PTBT, Tlatelolco, CTBTO, IND NNT, Pelindaba) have not been ratified by states parties and thus have not gone into effect. Case studies of successful regimes and failed regimes reveal the factors that enhance the regime's ability to implement, and explain the phenomenon of support or rejection by the great power selectively intervening in the factors that strengthen the implementation. This study reveals the factors that determine support or rejection of the regime for the nonproliferation of WMD by the great power, which can be used as a very useful tool for evaluating the regime’s effectiveness and predicting the future of regimes. Through comparing successful cases of the CWC with failures of the BWC, the thesis asserts that four determinants influence the great power's decision to support or reject regimes: ‘non-restraint,’ economic interests, the technology gap and bargaining. Regardless of the counterparts' aims and the type of weapon, the great power provides full support to strengthen a regime effectiveness when faced with a regime i) aiming to never constrain states’ freedom of behaviors, ii) enhancing economic interests, iii) demonstrating a relatively narrow the technology gap between the great power and regional powers exist, and iv) bargaining with regional powers to garner support. The implication of this study can be applied to the BWC which remains weak in status responding North Korea’s biological threats on Korean peninsula. Moreover, considering the fact that future pandemic may not be naturally occurring diseases, but artificial biological terrorism and deliberate attacks, measures to strengthen the implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention must be urgently needed to respond to large-scale biological incidents including the next pandemic that require transnational responses in the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0