메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Clayton R. Kuklick (West Virginia University) Brian T. Gearity (University of Denver) Melissa Thompson (University of Southern Mississippi)
저널정보
한국코칭능력개발원 International Journal of Coaching Science International Journal of Coaching Science Vol.9 No.2
발행연도
2015.7
수록면
23 - 42 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Given the need for coach education to develop the essential skill of reflection in coaches (Cushion & Nelson, 2013; Gilbert & Trudel, 2001), the purpose of the current study was to understand how and why 21 coaching students enrolled in a practicum course at a southeastern United States institution engage in reflective practice. This research draws upon Schon’s (1983, 1987) work on reflective practice, which underpinned a set of online structured reflective journaling prompts (ORJ) used as an intervention. Each week, for 12 weeks of the practicum course, students were asked to respond to a theoretically informed prompt. We collected data from the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS; Grant et al., 2002), Powell’s (1989) levels of reflection rubric, and the students’ weekly journal responses. The quantitative results revealed that time had significant influence on levels of reflection (p < .01), but not SRIS. The qualitative findings resulted in 15 themes which were categorized as: students’ role frames, students’ self-identified weaknesses, students’ dilemma identification, and students’ responses to dilemmas that describe what students reflected upon in their practicum. These findings are discussed in relation to existing research on reflective practice, student learning in higher education, intrapersonal knowledge development, and the use of technology. Implications for future research and coach educators are offered by considering the prompts influence on the students and the use of technology to facilitate learning in coach education.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions and Limitations
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-692-001971378