지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to re?evaluate Barth`s analysis of Anselm`s theological epistemology in Anselm: Fides Quaerens Intellectum. Barth understood Anselm`s theological epistemology embedded in the Proslogion II?IV as a mode of analogia fidei. The essence of the analogia fidei is faithfulness to the biblical revelation, that is, obedience to the Word of God and ultimately to the reality of God. Barth argued that his analysis of Anselm`s theological epistemology was based on his own research and interpretation of almost the entire works of Anselm. However, the Monologion which was written one year before the emergence of the Proslogion did not adopt a mode of the analogia fidei which Barth argued can be applied to the whole context of Anselm`s works. In the Monologion, Anselm did not depend on the authority of the Bible for the validity of his argument. Furthermore, he proved the existence of God not from the concept of God as in the case of Proslogion II but from creatures. This kind of proof is closer to the cosmological argument which was later promulgated by Aquinas. Moreover, in Monologion LXIV?LXVII the rational mind of a human being is suggested as the foundation of his theological epistemology. In this sense, the theological epistemology of the Monologion does not belong to analogia fidei but to analogia entis. Therefore, we need to re?evaluate Barth`s understanding of Anselm`s theological epistemology through a closer and meticulous research of Anslem`s other works such as the De Grammatico, the Meditationes and the Cur Deus Homo.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0