메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제70집
발행연도
2010.7
수록면
229 - 252 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Even though he failed to become a successor to Wesley because he passed away earlier than Wesley, John Fletcher has been regarded as the first Wesleyan theologian and was designated by Wesley as his successor. The reason why Fletcher has been called the first Wesleyan theologian is that as a contemporary to Wesley, he not only interpreted, defended and advocated for Wesley`s theology against critics in the Reformed traditions, but also had an influence on them. Besides, he was a man who told people of the doctrine of Christian perfection which was Wesley`s theology. He successfully made them focus on it. However, rather than being treated as the first Wesleyan theologian, Fletcher has been judged as a theologian with his own theological logic. This is because unlike Wesley, as an activist of the Holy Spirit he emphasized Pentecostal tongues and insisted on the concept of Christian perfection by the Holy Spirit. However, we cannot decide rashly whether Fletcher took his own logic diametrically opposed to Wesley`s by emphasizing the Holy Spirit, or whether he expanded his own theology based on Wesley`s theology as a supplement to Wesley`s view. If Fletcher had stood distinctly apart from Wesley, Wesley would not have named Fletcher as his successor and would not have consented to Fletcher`s writings. Accordingly, this article has compared and analyzed the common grounds and differences between Fletcher`s conception of Christian perfection centered on the Holy Spirit and that of Wesley, based on Christian perfection which is a central concept of Wesley`s theology. Also, this article has clarified that although there are a few differences between them, Fletcher`s notions were not totally different concepts from Wesley`s, but points that Wesley had agreed with and approved. Furthermore, this article has illuminated how Wesley`s theology and Pentecostal theology can be connected, and has suggested a research project on how Wesleyan theology can accept Pentecostal tongues, embrace Pentecostal theology, and develop further. Finally, this article has dealt with the disputes and contributions of Fletcher as a true Wesleyan theologian, mentioning the common grounds and differences between Fletcher and Wesley.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0