메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박세혁 (서울과학기술대학교)
저널정보
한국사회체육학회 한국사회체육학회지 한국사회체육학회지 제59권 제1호
발행연도
2015.2
수록면
271 - 282 (12page)
DOI
10.51979/KSSLS.2015.02.59.271

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A lack of precision and redundant concepts and definitions in relation to commitment and flow in the field of leisure and sport has increased confusion in conceptualization and measurement. The primary purpose of this paper was to identify the problems of misuse and confusion in terms, conceptualization, and measurement in studying commitment, and flow, and to suggest possible solutions in leisure and sport studies in Korea. Csikszentmihalyi (1975) conceptualized flow as an optimal experience that stems from individuals" perceptions of challenges and skills in given situations. On the other hand, Scanlan, Carpenter, Schmidt, Simons, and Keeler (1993) introduced sport commitment model to explain participants" underlying reasons for continued participation in sports including both recreational and elite athletes. Sport commitment refers to “psychological state representing the desire and resolve to continue sport participation” (Scanlan, Carpenter, Schmidt, et al., 1993, p.6). A total of 122 published papers in major journals were analyzed. Finding indicated that only 36 papers (29.5%) were found to use the terms, concepts, and instruments in a proper manner. It is evident that the misleading measurement arising from confusing conceptualization and theory development may result in management mishaps as well as research garbages. Without settlement on some common conceptualizations and measurement, the study on commitment and flow will fail to advance. This study then presents appropriate ways of reducing confusion and misuse of concepts, term, sand instruments. Much work is needed in theoretical and methodological construction and development in leisure studies.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (2)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0