지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper explored the purpose of the second Farmers’ Uprising and anti-Japanese resistance focusing on the trial process of the farmer leaders such as Jeon Bong-jun. It was an attempt to avoid one-sided historical records written by the Kabo Reform government and Japanese army. The leaders of the first Farmer’s Uprising such as Jeon Bong-jun, Son Hwa-jung and Kim Kae-nam had different ideas on the political circumstances around late August, 1894. However, they reunited for uprising influenced by the Sino-Japanese War and Taewongun’s secret instructions and orders. The purpose of the second uprising was to ask the responsibility of Japan in their illegal occupation of Kongbok Palace and violating national sovereignty. To suppress the uprising, Japanese army responded with massacre and court ruling.
After December in 1894, the leaders of the farmers’ army was interrogated and the case was put into a court. The trial was conducted by the lawcourt of the Bureau of Judicial Affairs. But Japan intervened the trial process and even led the whole process. Uchida Sadazuchi, a Japanese consul, interrogated intensively about the involvement of Taewongun in the uprising. If closely looking at the interrogation, Jeon Bong-jun denied the connection between Heungseon Taewongun and the uprising. Instead of criticizing Taewongun, he suggested a new political reform based on the representative council as a new national system. Thus, in the ruling, only the anti-Japanese aspect of the uprising was recorded, and the connection between Taewongun and the uprising was not recorded. However, in the final ruling, he was accused for the revolts on the basis of the old Choson’s law, and anti-Japanese characteristics of the uprising was erased. Moreover, even though there was an upcoming opening of the new court system in April, 1895, the Kabo reform government executed the leaders of the uprising relentlessly. For this reason, the responsibility of the execution of the leaders of the farmers’ uprising was on Kabo reform government and Japan. This also make us to rethink the implementation of the modern legal system and the meaning of modern law enforcement.
After December in 1894, the leaders of the farmers’ army was interrogated and the case was put into a court. The trial was conducted by the lawcourt of the Bureau of Judicial Affairs. But Japan intervened the trial process and even led the whole process. Uchida Sadazuchi, a Japanese consul, interrogated intensively about the involvement of Taewongun in the uprising. If closely looking at the interrogation, Jeon Bong-jun denied the connection between Heungseon Taewongun and the uprising. Instead of criticizing Taewongun, he suggested a new political reform based on the representative council as a new national system. Thus, in the ruling, only the anti-Japanese aspect of the uprising was recorded, and the connection between Taewongun and the uprising was not recorded. However, in the final ruling, he was accused for the revolts on the basis of the old Choson’s law, and anti-Japanese characteristics of the uprising was erased. Moreover, even though there was an upcoming opening of the new court system in April, 1895, the Kabo reform government executed the leaders of the uprising relentlessly. For this reason, the responsibility of the execution of the leaders of the farmers’ uprising was on Kabo reform government and Japan. This also make us to rethink the implementation of the modern legal system and the meaning of modern law enforcement.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 농민군 지도자의 재판과정과 2차 봉기의 쟁점
Ⅲ. 일본 간섭하 농민군 재판과 판결 선고 · 집행의 부당성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
5·18항쟁 기록물의 생성과 유통
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
19세기말 경상도 성주의 사회변동과 동학농민전쟁
대구사학
2015 .01
-
폭력과 윤리 - 4·3을 생각함
인문학연구
2019 .12
-
1946년 10월 항쟁과 해방기의 소설
구보학보
2019 .01
-
동학농민혁명과 고부봉기의 위상
전북사학
2017 .01
-
한국의 민주화운동과 ‘3.1운동 기억’: 4.19혁명에서 6월항쟁까지
동방학지
2018 .01
-
김시종의 ‘재일’과 제주 4․3의 시적 형상화
한민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
해기옹 김령의 한시에 나타난 단성농민항쟁-108률 시를 중심으로-
동방한문학
2016 .01
-
부마항쟁의 문학적 재현 방식의 다변화 연구 -<1980>과 ｢손수건｣을 중심으로-
우리어문연구
2022 .09
-
5·18 광주항쟁의 경험과 사건의 주체 구성 - 기동타격대 대원들의 구술생애담을 대상으로
어문논총
2023 .02
-
‘마주침’에 대하여-6월항쟁의 소설적 재현
민족문학사연구
2016 .01
-
10월 항쟁의 문학적 형상화 연구
우리말글
2021 .06
-
제주 민중에게 제주 4.3은 무엇이었는가-민주화 이행기 제주 4.3이 민중항쟁으로 재현되는 과정과 방식-
우리문학연구
2023 .07
-
부마민주항쟁과 서울중심주의 - 광주와 부마(釜馬)의 운명적 결합, 그리고 그 반동에 대하여 -
한국민족문화
2023 .11
-
감정의 너머에서: 5·18의 다른 이해를 위한 탐색
동방학지
2022 .12
-
김석범 『화산도』에 나타난 4·3의 양상과 그 의미
열린정신 인문학연구
2016 .08
-
5.18의 법적 재현에서 나타난 대중봉기와 헌정
서강인문논총
2020 .04
-
고성농민항쟁에 나타난 지도자 행위와 상황적 지도성 연구
동아인문학
2019 .09
-
이광수의 『마의태자(麻衣太子)』에 나타난 지도자상 고찰
춘원연구학보
2023 .12
-
4월혁명의 국제적 파장과 ‘반란’의 1960년-일본의 안보투쟁과 터키의 5월정변과의 비대칭적 인식을 중심으로
민족문학사연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『동학사』의 제1차 동학농민전쟁 전개과정에 대한 서술 내용분석
배항섭
한국사연구
2015
.09
吳知泳 『東學史』의 집강소 오류와 기억의 진실
김양식
한국사연구
2015
.09
연암그룹의 夷狄 논의와 『春秋』
조성산
한국사연구
2016
.03
영어졸업인증제도에 관한 미디어 담론의 역사성 분석 : 미셸 푸코(Michel Foucault)의 통치성 논의를 중심으로
신동일
,
박수현
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2017
.11
영화 〈하얀 리본〉의 폭력에 관한 연구 : 문화인류학과 정신분석 이론을 중심으로
김석원
한국방송학회 학술대회 논문집
2017
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001420570