메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사회체육학회 한국사회체육학회지 한국사회체육학회지 제6권
발행연도
1996.11
수록면
213 - 224 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to examine the Client`s Satisfaction about the District Sports Center Management by sex, age, school career and to examine the degree of satisfaction of total clients about the District Sports Center Management. The Subjects were the District Sports Center managing every self-government district of Seoul City, and The final subjects were all 570 people-male 136 and female 434. The questionnaire used on this study was the Client`s Satisfaction questionnaire about management of District Sports Center which modified "Sports for All Class survey analysis questionnaire" developed by the Korean Sports Science Institute. The reliability of the questionnaire was cronbach`s α=.7232~.8547. The statistics employed in this study were frequency, T-test, one-way Anova methods. Discussion on the results described using both frequency results and data considered through literature study. The results of this study were as follows: 1. Client`s satisfaction of District Sports Center Management by sex didn`t have any difference. Also in sub-factor didn`t have any difference. Client`s satisfaction score of District Sports Center Management, Female(3.24) higher than Male(3.23). 2. Client`s satisfaction of District Sports Center Management by age, didn`t have any difference. Over fifty(3.43) group was very high. 3. Client`s satisfaction of District Sports Center Management by school career didn`t have any difference. Over graduate(3.35) group was very high. 4. The degree to Satisfaction of total clients about the District Sports Management. 1) Satisfaction score about program of the Client of District Sports Center was high, 3.29. In sub-factor, Variety score was 3.15, Interest score was 3.62, Coincidence score between sport program and level was 3.66, Easiness score of sport program learning was 3.25. But Fitness score of participation number was low, 2.78. 2) Satisfaction score about leader of the Client of District Sports Center was very high, 3.71. In sub-factor, Practice ability score was 3.73, Way of teaching score was 3.63, Passion score was 3.78, Personal relationship score was 3.71, Professional knowledge score was 3.72. All sub-factor were over 3.00 and very high. 3) Satisfaction score about facility of the Client of District Sports Center was a little low, 2.96. In sub-factor, Principal sports facility score was 3.28, Adjunct facility score was 3.28. But Subsidiary facility score was low(2.89), Fitness score of sports supplies and equipment was very low(2.56), Completeness score of sports facility was low(2.79). 4) Satisfaction score about way of use and procedure of the Client of District Sports Center was a little low, 2.98. In sub-factor, Economics of use fare was high, 3.39. But Convenience score of registration procedure was low(2.77), Sufficiency score of free use time was low(2.87), Fitness score of using distance was low(2.82), Variety score of traffic facility was low(2.96).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0