지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On March 31, 2014, the International Court of Justice(ICJ) judged that the current Japanese Antarctic scientific whaling program did not fall within the provisions of Article VIII, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. As a result ICJ asked Japan to revoke any extant authorization, permit or licence granted for scientific whaling.
Japan accepted the decision immediately, but announced that a new scientific whaling plan would be submitted to the International Whaling Commission(IWC). Because the ICJ judgement is confined to the current Antarctic whaling, Japan’s North Pacific scientific whaling program is still in operation. The ICJ ruling acts as a guide for Japan’s future scientific whaling program rather than signalizing the collapse of the program.
The Japanese whaling program is not driven by economic motives, but rather by cultural motives. To uphold their traditions, the Japanese government intends to continue its whaling program in spite of the international opposition.
Korea has attempted to conduct scientific whaling twice, in 1986 and in 2012, but abandoned the plans due to strong opposition by the IWC members. Korea wants to resume whaling within the IWC’s legal frame work, rather than in the controversial Japanese scientific whaling approach.
Considering the whaling quota allocation program in IWC, scaling up the current sighting survey to reduce uncertainty in the abundance estimates, and strictly managing incidental whale catches in Korean waters would better ensure the Korean government could obtain the IWC quota.
Fostering the whale watching industry, reducing the conflicts between fishermen and dolphins, and further developing international research cooperation are also recommended to accomplish sustainable management of the cetacean resources in Korean waters.
Japan accepted the decision immediately, but announced that a new scientific whaling plan would be submitted to the International Whaling Commission(IWC). Because the ICJ judgement is confined to the current Antarctic whaling, Japan’s North Pacific scientific whaling program is still in operation. The ICJ ruling acts as a guide for Japan’s future scientific whaling program rather than signalizing the collapse of the program.
The Japanese whaling program is not driven by economic motives, but rather by cultural motives. To uphold their traditions, the Japanese government intends to continue its whaling program in spite of the international opposition.
Korea has attempted to conduct scientific whaling twice, in 1986 and in 2012, but abandoned the plans due to strong opposition by the IWC members. Korea wants to resume whaling within the IWC’s legal frame work, rather than in the controversial Japanese scientific whaling approach.
Considering the whaling quota allocation program in IWC, scaling up the current sighting survey to reduce uncertainty in the abundance estimates, and strictly managing incidental whale catches in Korean waters would better ensure the Korean government could obtain the IWC quota.
Fostering the whale watching industry, reducing the conflicts between fishermen and dolphins, and further developing international research cooperation are also recommended to accomplish sustainable management of the cetacean resources in Korean waters.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. IWC 협약 및 일본 조사포경 개요
Ⅲ. ICJ 판결 분석
Ⅳ. 일본 및 호주 정부의 대응
Ⅴ. 대한민국 정부의 IWC 내 입장
Ⅵ. 결론 및 고찰
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-529-001156677