메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조원득 (명지대학교) 홍정연 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제23권 제6호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
533 - 544 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine the accuracy of ballet movement learning effectiveness on ballet beginners who have different learning characteristics through the video evaluation based on verbal feedbacks. There are few detailed hypotheses; the first, a self-modeling group assumes superior learning accomplishments than a peer-modeling group on accuracy of movement; second, a self-modeling group assumes superior learning accomplishments than a expert-modeling group on accuracy of movement; lastly, a peer-modeling group assumes superior learning accomplishments than a expert-modeling group on accuracy of movement.
This study was conducted for 48 high school students whose major are dance but not ballet. 48 participants were randomly divided into 4 groups which are a self-modeling group, peer-modeling group, expert-modeling group, and control group. This study is structured by composition of 10 individual ballet movements within one minute and 30 seconds from Enchainement. In other words, this is structured in composite movement and proven results in 2 stages; acquisition and retention.
The results are as below: First, self-modeling group certainly shows exceptional learning results compare to an peer-modeling group; second, self-modeling group certainly shows exceptional learning results compare to an expert-modeling group; lastly, a expert-modeling group indicates that they show limited learning results than the peer-modeling group in acquisition stage, however, there are no statistically significant between peer-modeling and expert modeling in retention stage.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-692-001017351