지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Studies in Linguistics 34, 1-20. The man ‘only’ sentence in (1) conveys two propositions: the exclusive proposition that nobody other than Yuna came to the party and the proposition that Yuna came to the party, which we will call the prejacent.
(1) Yuna-man party-e o-ass-ta
Yuna-only party-to come-Past-Decl
‘Only Yuna came to the party.’
The meaning of the English adverb only has been the subject of intense debate; in particular, regarding the status of its prejacent. It has been argued that it is a presupposition, a conversational implicature, and an entailment. The detailed consideration of the meaning of man ‘only’ elucidates the relationship between these various types of meanings. This paper aims to argue that the prejacent of Korean man ‘only’ sentences is closer to a presupposition than to an entailment or a conversational implicature. A problem is that the prejacent can felicitously be new information. However, according to the common ground theory of pragmatic presuppositions, informative presuppositions aren’t the problem that they might have initially appeared to be.
(1) Yuna-man party-e o-ass-ta
Yuna-only party-to come-Past-Decl
‘Only Yuna came to the party.’
The meaning of the English adverb only has been the subject of intense debate; in particular, regarding the status of its prejacent. It has been argued that it is a presupposition, a conversational implicature, and an entailment. The detailed consideration of the meaning of man ‘only’ elucidates the relationship between these various types of meanings. This paper aims to argue that the prejacent of Korean man ‘only’ sentences is closer to a presupposition than to an entailment or a conversational implicature. A problem is that the prejacent can felicitously be new information. However, according to the common ground theory of pragmatic presuppositions, informative presuppositions aren’t the problem that they might have initially appeared to be.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 주요 분석들과 문제점
3. 논의
4. 나오는 말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술대회논문] - Abusch, D. / 2002 / Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions / Proceedings of SALT 12, Cornell University
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Atlas, J / 1993 / The Importance of being only: Testing the Neo-Gricean versus Neo-entailment paradigms / Journal of Semantics 10 : 301 ~ 318
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Choi, J. W / 1998 / Korean focus marker man : formal semantic analysis / Korean Semantics 3 : 41 ~ 65
4. [학위논문] - von Fintel, K. / 2000 / What is presupposition accommodation? / ms / MIT
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - von Fintel, K / 2008 / What is presupposition accommodation, again? / Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1) : 137 ~ 170
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Atlas, J / 1993 / The Importance of being only: Testing the Neo-Gricean versus Neo-entailment paradigms / Journal of Semantics 10 : 301 ~ 318
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Choi, J. W / 1998 / Korean focus marker man : formal semantic analysis / Korean Semantics 3 : 41 ~ 65
4. [학위논문] - von Fintel, K. / 2000 / What is presupposition accommodation? / ms / MIT
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - von Fintel, K / 2008 / What is presupposition accommodation, again? / Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1) : 137 ~ 170
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
`만`과 `도`의 이차 의미 : 전제인가 고정함축인가
언어학 연구
2016 .10
-
한국어 의미·화용론에서 본 전제 연구
인문학연구
2020 .06
-
The role of alternative propositions in uses of English at least.
언어학
2023 .06
-
An Argumantative Analysis of Korean -Kkaci
현대문법연구
2023 .06
-
영어와 한국어의 전제 유발체 비교 분석
영어영문학
2018 .02
-
What Does an Exclusive Sentence Primarily Assert? An Experimental Study
영어학연구
2023 .02
-
화용론적, 번역학적 접근을 통한 『금강경』텍스트에 나타난 화용 요소인 전제 표현의 한한(漢韓)번역 고찰
통번역교육연구
2021 .12
-
Focus Types and the Presupposition Function of Korean -To
언어과학
2015 .01
-
Presupposition Projection of Conditionals
언어와 정보
2019 .02
-
한국어 부정 유형에 따른 전제 의미의 심리적 실재성
언어
2020 .12
-
Presupposition Disclosure : A Key Strategy in Philosophical Practice
Journal of Humanities Therapy
2017 .06
-
Cultural Presupposition and Accommodation
언어연구
2018 .01
-
Anaphoricity and Accommodation: A Comparison of Too in English and -To in Korean
언어연구
2019 .01
-
An Argumentative Approach to Too in English*
영어학연구
2016 .01
-
한국어 연결어미 ‘-아서’와 ‘-니까’의 전제의미의 활용방안
담화와인지
2018 .02
-
On the Intervention Effect Caused by Korean -man
어학연구
2018 .12
-
부사격 조사 ‘(으)로서’의 ‘매개념’ 기능과 의미기능의 확장
어문론집
2021 .03
-
보조사 ‘도’의 의미작용과 기능의 통합적 설명에 대하여 - ‘전제 유발자’, ‘전제 수용’, ‘연결 짓기’ 등의 개념을 기반으로 -
어문론집
2022 .09
-
전제 수용 현상과 맥락의 개정
언어와 정보
2020 .07
-
Confirmatory yet Sensitive to Posterior Probability: A Note on the Semantic Composition of Korean Conditional Evaluatives
언어
2024 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-705-001092847