메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
정하경 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국노어노문학회 한국노어노문학회 학술대회 발표집 한국노어노문학회 L.톨스토이 서거 100주년 기념 국제학술대회: 톨스토이 연구의 세가지 관점
발행연도
2010.11
수록면
322 - 330 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The concept of “anti-agentivity” has frequently been discussed as one of the key features of Russian language and culture. In contrast to western culture, usually characterized as a culture of logic and rationalism, Slavic culture has been described as irrational, receptive, contemplative, and acquiescing to fate. This conception has been actively explored in such fields as literature and history, but has also been developed as a concrete theme in Russian linguistics. This paper examines the structural base of Russian ‘anti-agentivity” from a generative perspective and consider whether this generally accepted idea about the correlation between Russian language and culture can be justified in syntactic terms. In particular, I show that the HAVE/BE syntactic parameter and related syntactic structures such as applicatives result in dative-infinitive, dative-lexical modal, and dativereflexive constructions, which, Wierzbicka (1992) suggests, reveal the anti-agentive character of Russian language. I show that such anti-agentivity is not a specifically Russian phenomenon but is a consequence of a universal syntactic parameter. I propose that at least some of the linguistic features considered to be reflections of cultural/national identity are in fact universal phenomena.
Beyond the question of the validity of the notion of anti-agentivity for Russian, the discussion in this paper extends to the question of whether language reflects cultural and mental characteristics. The Sapir & Whorf hypothesis of language determinism, an extreme view in this direction, has been abandoned and replaced by more moderate views of language relativism. However, Daniel Everett’s work (2005) on the language of the Amazonian tribe Piraha suggests a more direct and closer relationship between language and culture/mind/cognition, and it seems to have revived active discussion of language universals and language specificity. It is not the goal of this paper to provide a definite answer to this grand question, but to call attention to certain universal aspects of language that should be obligatorily included in the consideration of this kind of question.

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 러시아어의 비행위주성(Not being in control; Anti-agentivity)
3. 러시아어 비행위주성의 생성문법적 고찰
4. 비교언어학적 고찰과 언어보편성
5. 나오며
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0