메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강계숙 (명지대학교)
저널정보
한국시학회 한국시학연구 한국시학연구 제41호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
169 - 206 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The combination of poetry and science was a very important thesis in 1950’s Korean modern poetry. Modernist poets in 1950’s believed that it was a main task of Korean modern poetry to have science characteristic. So, they more radically pursued their aesthetic ideals of the combination of poetry and science than Kim-kirim in 1930’s. This poetic tendency resulted from their strong opposition to traditional poetry of the same age. They thought that traditional poetry to express oriental nature was old-fashioned, and that it was an effective way of innovation of modern poetry to write developed mechanisms and represent contemporary scientific civilization.
Meanwhile, they named themselves a ‘citizen’, which meant a cosmopolitan following international development course. It was regarded a fundamental condition to have science characteristic for establishing cosmopolitan identity. They considered the urgent retention of internationality as a historical precedence, and believed that establishing cosmopolitan identity and securing internationality depended on ‘becoming science’ in themselves. To them, the essence of modernity was the achievement of science. This ideas of 1950’s modernists were created by their senses of cosmopolitan identity and viewpoints of regarding with the best science.
This thoughts about the modernization of Korean poetics were reflected in the representations of scientific technology in 1950’s modern poetry. For example, the ‘earth’ represented a wide residence of cosmopolitans, and a ‘international train’ symbolized their self-image in many poems. Comparing with an sad local train expressing their hidden femininity, a loudly international train embodied the ideal masculinity to desire to possess. But the fact that many advanced products of science and technology were not theirs could not help causing double alienation from their ideals because modernists in 1950’s did not even have partial symbols, namely ‘jet plane’, ‘aircraft’, ‘helicopter’ and so on. Due to this, the poetic representations of scientific technology were often likened to various ‘tearful natures’. This sorrow was necessarily caused by double alienation from high technology and by a failure of establishing strong masculine identity.

목차

국문초록
Ⅰ. ‘시의 과학화’와 그 세대적 전유
Ⅱ. 담론 구축의 이면과 시적 형태
Ⅲ. 재신화화되는 기술표상과 ‘비애’의 감정
Ⅳ. 결론을 대신하여:“문명에 대항하는 비결은/당신자신이 문명이 되는 것”
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0